Re Fw Sweatman V. Zeeman 21Cv9795 5¶

He needs to Move the fence

You are not following the exact words of the transcript and you keep lying to me ie the cantilever was a flat out lie that I just learned about. - help me understand how that is fiduciary??

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 6:19PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > wrote:

For clarity, the Court Order uses settlement agreement as a non-capitalized, non-defined term; it is used in the general sense to indicate that the Judge is aware the parties have reached a resolution as it was read into the transcript at court. It is not referring to any specific settlement agreement and the settlement agreement draft was never sent to the Court. What we are doing with the settlement agreement draft is to memorialize the agreement all parties reached. We needed the Court Order in order to effectuate the settlement due to the non-conformities and to expedite the City/County approval of the plat as strongly suggested by Gaddy which you were aware of. This is the same as someone filing a Notice of Settlement which stays a case pending the parties memorializing their agreement into a written document. Formal settlement agreements arent reviewed by the Judge unless there has been a breach and someone files a motion to enforce.

In our case, the Judge was aware of the potential, complex issues with the variance appeal and time frame to resolve the case. A Judge is not going to take the case off of a calendar unless there is a document indicating the parties settled, which is what this is.

The Court only reviewed this Order and the attached plat.

Please let me know if you need further clarity.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>  Smyrna, GA 30081 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>

11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  Ste 125 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>    | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>   Alpharetta, Ga 30009 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> 
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > 
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 5:56 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com <mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >
Subject: Re: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795

Odyssey has it listed as closed.

I spoke to the court because you never said anything ever to me- they confirmed it was closed and not on the judges docket.

I have zero protection from the court - and per the transcripts exact words you have decided not to follow.

He needs to move the fence.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:52PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:

    Sarah,

    The Judge reviewed the plat and we settled in court. The Judge was demanding the Order with the plat attached. Also, the case is administratively closed which was done by the Judge; this is not closed. We have no control over how the Court manages a case. Per the hearing, which you attended, they demanded that we meet the various deadlines and, upon receipt of the plat, stated that the case would be administratively closed pending final settlement. This does not impact any motion to enforce settlement or other filings which may be applicabl