Skip to content

Re No To 4 Ft Stakes 4

Field Value
Category Financial > Attorney Billing
Confidence high
Reason Client requests reimbursement for deposition fees and settlement fund accounting from attorney
Original File re-no-to-4-ft-stakes-4.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From szeeman@gmail.com
To Brett Ledermeier
Subject Re: No to 4 ft stakes.
Date No to 4 ft stakes.
Email Body

Hi Brett,

Before scheduling, I would like to address the case's financials.

I should not have been responsible for covering half of the fees for the depositions and transcripts, as those expenses are explicitly covered under the insurance policy I purchased. Therefore, I request a reimbursement of the full amount paid by me and Jeff.

Additionally, I seek clarification regarding the $15,000 awarded in the settlement. You indicated that the opposing party had already provided the funds immediately following the court proceedings. Could you please confirm where these funds are currently being held? Also, I would appreciate confirmation whether any interest has accrued on this amount.

I would like to request the prompt release of the full amounts, along with any applicable interest.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 1:25PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > wrote:

Sarah,

Opposing counsel agreed not to stake the property, so it has been cancelled. I am going to try to set up a zoom call with Gaddy to go over the survey. What time(s) Thursday or Friday work best for you? Thursday is best for me, but I can do Friday before noon and after 4PM as well.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 7:17 AM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com <mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >
Subject: Re: No to 4 ft stakes.

Good morning Brett,

Can you respond to following outstanding inquiries:

1. Who is paying for the extra stakes? Is there fee? Is my insurance policy paying?

2. You mention, a field worker is coming today (Tuesday) to stake the property again - what is the name of this person and what time?

3. You stated you have in email from Rose admitting she misrepresented to the judge that the property had not been staked , can you please provide that email?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:02PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > wrote:

    Who is paying for the extra stakes?

    Is there fee?

    He needs to pay for it.

    Hes trying to milk you for every penny - Brett

    On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:12AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:

        Sarah,

        Per the Judges Order, which was outlined at the hearing on January 13th, if either party deems it necessary to stake the Property line, then we are required to have it staked. Yesterday, I mentioned that the surveyor field worker could go out Wednesday, but he emailed me this morning stating that it is actually Tuesday he can go out.

        I can try to call opposing counsel and will email her now to object, but we do not want the Judge involved in this as she was clearly not happy with the ongoing disputes.

        Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
        Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

        Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>  Smyrna, GA 30081 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>

        11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  Ste 125 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>    | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpha

Download Original (.msg)