Skip to content

Order Approving Settlement And Plat Reconfiguration. Redlined

Field Value
Category Settlement > Post-Settlement Filings
Confidence high
Reason Court-approved consent judgment establishing settlement terms and plat reconfiguration
Original File 25-02.13.25-order-approving-settlement-and-plat-reconfiguration.-redlined.docx
File Type DOCX

Download

Document Text

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

COME NOW, Plaintiff Jonathan Sweatman (“Plaintiff Sweatman”) and Defendant Sarah Zeeman  (“Defendant Zeeman”), (collectively hereinafter referred to as the “Parties”) and enter into this Consent Judgment as follows:

Plaintiff Sweatman is the record holder of legal title and interest in certain real property located in DeKalb County, Georgia and more particularly described as follows (hereinafter “2746 Grove Street”):
ALL THAT Tract or parcel of land lying and being In Land Lot 240 and 241, 18th District, DeKalb County, Georgia, being Lot 2, GROVE PLACE, according to plat which is recorded in Plat Book 96, Page 9, DeKalb County, Georgia Records, said plat by this reference being incorporated herein and made a part hereof for a more complete description; said property being Improved property known as 2746 Grove Street, according to the present system of numbering houses in DeKalb County, Georgia.

Defendant Zeeman is the record holder of legal title and interest in the adjacent property, also located in DeKalb County, Georgia and more particularly described as follows (hereinafter “2740 Grove Street”):
All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Land Lot 240 and 241 of the 18th District of DeKalb County, Georgia, and being Lot 1 of Grove Place Subdivision, with any improvements thereon, as per plat of survey recorded in Plat Book 96, Page 14, DeKalb County, Georgia Records, which plat is incorporated herein by this reference.

Plaintiff Sweatman asserted claims against Defendant Zeeman including but not limited to injunctive relief and abatement of alleged encroachments from Defendant Zeeman’s Property onto Plaintiff Sweatman’s Property. In response Defendant Zeeman asserted counterclaims including but not limited to a declaration of the boundary line between the two properties.

he Parties agreed to relocate the adjoining boundary line between 2746 and 2740 Grove Street, as depicted on that certain Lot Reconfiguration Plan prepared by Gaddy Surveying & Design, Inc (“Lot Reconfiguration Plan”).

the property line adjoining the two properties identified above as 2746 and 2740 Grove Street be moved consistent the Lot Reconfiguration Plan.
that any existing non-conformities located on 2746 Grove Street as depicted on the Lot Reconfiguration Plan may remain on this property.

the Clerk of Court record this Consent Judgment in the . IT IS SO ORDERED, this _ day of ___, 2025.


            Honorable LaTisha Dear Jackson

DeKalb Superior Court, Division 7 DeKalb Judicial Circuit