Skip to content

Re Zeeman Motion To Quash Subpoena For Review 7

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason Email discusses consent motion for discovery stay pending mediation and mediator selection
Original File re-zeeman-motion-to-quash-subpoena-for-review-7.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com
To Richard J. Capriola; Tania Tuttle; Eric B. Coleman; David Atkinson
Subject RE: Zeeman - Motion to Quash Subpoena for Review
Date Zeeman - Motion to Quash Subpoena for Review
Email Body

Lisa Rose has agreed to a Consent Motion staying discovery pending mediation, followed by a 90 day extension to the discovery period. The stay would be in effect immediately and no depositions will be conducted prior to mediation. However, she will still be serving responses to my written discovery, subject only to a 3 week extension, prior to mediation.

The mediator and available dates are still TBA. Plaintiff has not agreed to any of the mediators we have suggested to date, and Sarah will not agree to Phil Bettis. Lisa told me that she thinks the mediator should have judicial experience and I mentioned Judge Forsling at miles with whom Ive had great success (including in stormwater runoff cases).

Ill draft and circulate the proposed consent motion.

Joe Emanuel http://joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com/

404.888.6231

NOTICE: This email message and all attachments may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized transmittal. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality, including all privileges that may apply. Pursuant to those rights and privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies of the message and the attachments immediately. NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION. If you do not have a signed fee contract or engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your attorney.??

From: Richard J. Capriola rcapriola@wczlaw.com Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 7:40 AM To: Tania Tuttle ttuttle@mmatllaw.com; Eric B. Coleman ecoleman@wczlaw.com; David Atkinson David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com; Joseph G. Emanuel joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com Cc: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com; Darcy A. DeFruscio ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com Subject: RE: Zeeman - Motion to Quash Subpoena for Review

Looks good.

Where are we with the stay/extension of discovery and mediation?

http://www.wczlaw.net/


Rich Capriola

Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC

One Ameris Center 3490 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30305 www.wczlaw.com http://www.wczlaw.com/

rcapriola@wczlaw.com rcapriola@wczlaw.com

View Bio https://wczlaw.com/attorneys/chadd-l-reynolds/

tel

dir tel

404.844.5700

404.844.5637

This communication (together with all attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information and its sender reserves and asserts all rights that may apply to it. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error and delete the copy you received. Thank you.

Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

From: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com ttuttle@mmatllaw.com > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2022 8:54 PM To: Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com rcapriola@wczlaw.com >; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com ecoleman@wczlaw.com >; David Atkinson <David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com >; Joseph G. Emanuel <joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com > Cc: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com >; Darcy A. DeFruscio <ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com > Subject: Zeeman - Motion to Quash Subpoena for Review

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

All: I know we are looking at staying discovery and moving forward with mediation but I thought we should probably just get a basic motion of record in regards to Chastain & Associates. Please see attached and let me know if you have any objection to me filing the same. I ju

Download Original (.msg)