Skip to content

Re Sweatman V. Zeeman 21Cv9795 33

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason Attorney discussing settlement terms and consent judgment negotiation strategy
Original File re-sweatman-v.-zeeman-21cv9795-33.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From lisa@roselitigation.lawyer
To Daldry, Amy Lynn
Subject RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Date Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Email Body

Ms. Daldry,

I notified defense counsel of my client Mr. Sweatmans election to proceed with submitting a Consent Judgment to the Court instead of submitting first for a variance to the City and County.

The essence of the Consent Judgment will provide for at a minimum that (1) the property line is to be moved consistent with the parties agreement and as depicted on Gaddys survey and (2) allowing any existing non-conformities to remain on the properties as depicted on Gaddys survey.

Defense counsel is obligated to prepare the Consent Judgment and all settlement documents for my review.

Thank you,

Lisa Rose

Lisa Rose Rose Litigation, LLC

Mailing: 4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068 O: 678.806.8188 E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer lisa@roselitigation.lawyer W: www.roselitigation.lawyer http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.

From: Daldry, Amy Lynn ADaldry@dekalbcountyga.gov Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 5:28 PM To: Lisa Rose lisa@roselitigation.lawyer; Bilic, Renata rbilic2@dekalbcountyga.gov Cc: Darcy A. DeFruscio ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com; banksnriedel@hotmail.com; Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com; Jeff Banks jeffsbanks@hotmail.com; Tania Tuttle ttuttle@mmatllaw.com; Timothy L. Mitchell tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795

Good evening,

Thank you for the update, and thanks to everyone for prioritizing this matter. The deadline is extended until Monday at noon unless (very) good cause is shown for a further extension.

Regards,

Amy Daldry

Law Clerk to Judge LaTisha Dear Jackson

DeKalb County Superior Court - Division 7

DeKalb Judicial Circuit | 4th Judicial Administrative District

556 N. McDonough St., Ste 7220, Decatur, GA 30030

adaldry@dekalbcountyga.gov adaldry@dekalbcountyga.gov

From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer lisa@roselitigation.lawyer > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 5:22 PM To: Bilic, Renata <rbilic2@dekalbcountyga.gov rbilic2@dekalbcountyga.gov > Cc: Darcy A. DeFruscio <ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com ddefruscio@mmatllaw.com >; banksnriedel@hotmail.com banksnriedel@hotmail.com ; Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com >; Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com jeffsbanks@hotmail.com >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com ttuttle@mmatllaw.com >; Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com >; Daldry, Amy Lynn <ADaldry@dekalbcountyga.gov ADaldry@dekalbcountyga.gov > Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795

Good evening.

This email serves to update the Court on the Order Setting Deadlines filed 1.15.25.

As noted below in defense counsels email, he was unable to provide the revised survey on 1.16.25. I received the revised survey on 1.22.25. I informed counsel that we did not need additional marks/stakes placed at the property.

On 1.27.25 I told defense counsel of another mistake on the revised survey that had to be corrected.

On 2.3.25, the parties held a zoom conference with the surveyor to discuss the additional issue to be revised on the survey and the mechanics involved in obtaining a court order and/or seeking a variance/appeal for re-platting purposes,

Today at 1:16 pm, I received another updated survey that I have not had an opportunity to review with my client.

Plaintiffs deadline to elect whether to proceed with a court order or seek a variance/appeal expires today; however, Plaintiff needs 1-2 more days to review the newly received updated survey and to consider the implications of same. Plaintiffs counsel will notify defense counsel either tomorrow afternoon or by Saturday as to Plaintiffs election, which will be sufficient time for the parties to then collectively notify the Court on Monday, February 10, 2025 as t

Download Original (.msg)