Re Revisions To Settlement Agreement Re Sweatman V Zeeman 16¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Settlement > Correspondence |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | Settlement negotiation email discussing revisions to settlement agreement |
| Original File | re-revisions-to-settlement-agreement-re-sweatman-v-zeeman-16.msg |
| File Type | MSG |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER |
| To | Lisa Rose |
| Subject | RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman |
| Date | revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman |
Email Body
Lisa,
Are you free for a call on this today?
Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation
Mailing: 850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Lisa Rose lisa@roselitigation.lawyer Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 12:19 PM To: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Cc: Timothy L. Mitchell tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com Subject: RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman
Brett,
You are correct about the Easement Agreement, and I thought that was deleted, but I see it is included in Section 2.1. You can remove the Easement language only.
As to the penalty provision, you and I discussed options available to my client given Zeemans defiant behavior to identify to you as her counsel, the alleged code violations.
Her new counsel, David Stuart, also has not provided any verification/certification as to the alleged code violations.
Jonathan insists on the penalty because of your clients conduct.
-Lisa
Lisa Rose Rose Litigation, LLC
Mailing: 4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068
Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068 O: 678.806.8188
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.
From: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 12:14 PM To: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer lisa@roselitigation.lawyer > Cc: Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com > Subject: RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman
Lisa,
You and I previously had a call to discuss the revisions and specifically discussed the alleged code violations. It was my understanding that we agreed there wouldnt be a monetary penalty added into the settlement as we know it wont be agreed to and will further delay settlement. Also, I saw the easement language still in there. The fence will be on your client's property, so there is no need for any easement; I thought we were in agreement with this on our last call as well.
Before I circulate for further review, please let me know if you want to delete the monetary penalty provision and easement language.
Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation
Mailing: 850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,