Re Request For Documents And Return Of Communications 2¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Settlement > Correspondence |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | [sonnet] Attorney discusses settlement requests, plat, and City Attorney meeting |
| Original File | re-request-for-documents-and-return-of-communications-2.msg |
| File Type | MSG |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER |
| To | Sarah Zeeman |
| Subject | RE: Request for Documents and Return of Communications |
| Date | Request for Documents and Return of Communications |
Email Body
Sarah,
I am happy to send you communications and related documents with the Court. As for the calls, Jeff and I spoke numerous times over the last two weeks; I am unsure as to why there is any allegation to the contrary. With regard to any call from you, I do not have a missed call or request for call. I have sent numerous requests to you regarding the settlement that have gone unanswered; those requests have also offered to set up a call. If you would like to schedule a call with me, please let me know your availability.
Further, I was about to email you as the City Attorney reached out after speaking with Gaddy/plat expediter and would like to do a virtual meeting tomorrow to discuss the plat and Court Order/case generally. I am waiting for the time confirmation and you dont need to be in attendance, but if you would like to attend please let me know. Essentially, the City is saying they arent bound by the Court Order, which we anticipated would happen, but the Court Order route was what Gaddy suggested and the adjacent owner chose that route over a variance appeal route, which was his choice, not ours. Despite that route, they might still need to go the variance route; it depends on what the City Attorney says or demands (we dont want to expand the litigation by involving the City as a named party).
Ive copied my paralegal, Celeste, hereto. As previously stated, I am happy to schedule a call with you.
Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation
Mailing: 850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Sarah Zeeman szeeman@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:37 AM To: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Subject: Request for Documents and Return of Communications
Dear Brett,
I am writing to formally request that you provide me with copies of ALL documents, not limited to drafts, agreements, emails, and any other materials related to my court case, that you submitted or provided to the court in March 2025.
Additionally, I respectfully ask that you return the unanswered phone calls from both my attorney, Jeff Banks, and me at your earliest convenience.
Thank you for your prompt attention to these matters.
Best regards, Sarah
Smokeball Reference V3: fe80318a-fdfb-425f-9025-d790159d3013_5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8_f9729806-8c7f-4954-a881-d0ffe8221de0.