Re Litigation With Neighbor Title Insurance Retention 17¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Correspondence > Party-to-Party |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | Email chain between Sarah Zeeman and Tania regarding litigation deadlines and property access issues |
| Original File | re-litigation-with-neighbor-title-insurance-retention-17.msg |
| File Type | MSG |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | szeeman@gmail.com |
| To | Tania Tuttle |
| Subject | Re: Litigation with neighbor - title insurance retention |
| Date | Litigation with neighbor - title insurance retention |
Email Body
Also, an additional question to my questions above about the report date. (Which I believe in the courts eyes is still the 20th)
He removed the 4x4 wood surrounding my hvac but still has the orange stings over the unit. I have been able to have my winter hvac service done on the units due to this area and crafts.Can I have my hvac out to go service my units as it needs to be done as their routine maintenance ?
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:17 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com szeeman@gmail.com > wrote:
Hi Tania,
My apologies, as I am still a bit confused about the confirmed dates as I have not signed anything?
I was served the summons on 11/20 so Stewart was/is correct about the 20th date.
Summons link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XhhoEBt_M--9MEditlDl-eKBlxN4zv3Y/view?usp=sharing
Suit dates on the record with Dekalb county (to my knowledge)
* The suit filed: 11.12
* Summons served: 11.20
* Response to summons due 12.20
* My Request- for additional 7 days to Rose law would make the date 12.27, Rose's email commentary stating: https://prnt.sc/22ufjfj - I never received a proposal to sign.
From Ms. Rose's email today (12/13)
* Email screenshot: https://prnt.sc/22udpve
* Case filed 12.7.22
* Summons deadline 1.6.22
* Deadline to answer 1.13.22
* Not sure if this overrides her 12.7 email requiring signatures by both parties?
Additionally, there are a few caveats to this matter.
The survey Sweatman included in this suit, was not correctly obtained. It was ordered and paid for by my previous attorney Rick Ablembick who breached the agreement while he left me off of email communications and updates as he removed my $ out of escrow without approval.
* My agreement with Ablembick listed Ablembick to confirm survey pricing and it never occurred- https://prnt.sc/22ui358 and https://prnt.sc/22ugz7g I learned they took my retainer to pay $850 (unapproved $ from retainer) and paid for the survey and scheduling btw Sweatman and Rick
* Rick Ablembick/Clif removed me from email correspondence beginning 8.23 sporadically until 9.7 and during that time frame Sweatman, the Survey company, and Rick organized and paid for the survey to be attained and provided to Sweatman against my request https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BRCHL0zuiTQ3BIQffS_Ka6wMh7MwJK3l/view? <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BRCHL0zuiTQ3BIQffS_Ka6wMh7MwJK3l/view?usp=sharing>
* https://prnt.sc/22uxbnz - left me off of communication
* 9.7 I asked not to share a survey of my property https://prnt.sc/22uncml
* 9.10 Sweatman (unsolicited) called Rick for an 80-minute "chat" and Rick then sent me a bill for their un approved chit-chat
* 9.13 Survey was given to Sweatman
* 9.20 Terminated Rick Ablembick
* 9.21 Started submitting code violation tickets to the City of Brookhaven
* 10.8 Stop-work order issued but I am still waiting for a resolution as the backyard and NE side yard is unsafe/unusable
* https://prnt.sc/22uvgl7
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:50 AM Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:
OK never mind I see in the email. Stewart believed the answer deadline was the 20th but it looks like she didnt timely file the affidavit of service, which pushes your time to answer back. We will calendar the answer deadline for the 6th.
Tania R. Tuttle
Partner, Real Estate Litigation
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Main: 770-200-7000
Direct: 404.365.4575
ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> >
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 11:18 AM
To: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >
Cc: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> >; Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >
Subject: Re: Litigation with neighbor - title insurance retention
Good morning,
I just received a response for an extension from Ms. Rose and I am available any time to chat.
* Rose emails
* https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MB65zJ4EoCCpZJ8wBWG_OIMZhW1pZXEv/view?usp=sharing <