Re Sweatman V. Zeeman Zeeman Discovery Responses Statutory Electronic Service¶

Field	Value
Category	Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence	high
Reason	Attorney Lisa Rose requests discovery responses and property access from opposing counsel
Original File	`re-sweatman-v.-zeeman-zeeman-discovery-responses-statutory-electronic-service.msg`
File Type	MSG

Email¶

Header	Value
From	lisa@roselitigation.lawyer
To	Tania Tuttle; Brett Ledermeier; Lucy Aquino; Richard J. Capriola; Eric B. Coleman
Subject	RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service
Date	Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service

Email Body

Counsel:

Good morning. Last week I sent a request for permission for my client and his contractor to gain temporary access to your clients property in an effort to preserve and protect the fence. In addition to the preservation of the fence, painting and staining the fence will enhance the aesthetics of the fence for your client. In addition, I requested an update on the documents that were to be provided shortly after 4.1.22.

I have not heard back from anyone in response to both requests, other than Tanias email below. Please provide an update on both items.

I am available to discuss the parameters around the request to paint/stain the fence, so as to maintain the peace between our clients. I appreciate someone reaching out to me this week.

Thank you,

Lisa

Lisa Rose Rose Litigation, LLC

Mailing: 4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068 O: 678.806.8188 E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer lisa@roselitigation.lawyer W: www.roselitigation.lawyer http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.

From: Tania Tuttle ttuttle@mmatllaw.com Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 9:41 AM To: Lisa Rose lisa@roselitigation.lawyer; Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Cc: Lucy Aquino Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com; Richard J. Capriola rcapriola@wczlaw.com; Eric B. Coleman ecoleman@wczlaw.com Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service

Lisa Sally had her baby (healthy baby boy!) and is now out on maternity leave. I will confer with co-counsel and one of us will get back to you on both.

Thanks, Tania

Tania R. Tuttle Partner, Real Estate Litigation

11625 Rainwater Drive. | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4575

Cell: 404.661.3453

ttuttle@mmatllaw.com ttuttle@mmatllaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer lisa@roselitigation.lawyer > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 9:01 AM To: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com SCook@mmatllaw.com > Cc: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com ttuttle@mmatllaw.com >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com rcapriola@wczlaw.com >; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com ecoleman@wczlaw.com > Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service

Sally,

Good morning. When do you anticipate producing the responsive documents as indicated in your email dated 4.1.22?

Secondly, my client would like to paint/seal the fence to maintain its integrity. He requests permission from your client for his insured third party vendor to be able to stand on your clients yard, to paint the fence.

There is an obvious benefit to your client if the fence is painted as it will be more aesthetically pleasing and will better preserve the fence over time. Please call me to discuss this temporary request for access to her property by the vendor to paint the fence.

Thank you,

Lisa

Lisa Rose Rose Litigation, LLC

Mailing: 4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068

Download Original (.msg)