Skip to content

Re Sweatman V Zeeman Consolidated Pretrial Order 5

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence high
Reason Email exchange between opposing counsel discussing pretrial order deadline and settlement
Original File re-sweatman-v-zeeman-consolidated-pretrial-order-5.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER
To David Atkinson
Subject RE: Sweatman v Zeeman - Consolidated Pretrial Order
Date Sweatman v Zeeman - Consolidated Pretrial Order
Email Body

I completely understand its not your money; if you could follow up and try to get a response today I would really appreciate it. As for the PTO, we need to have it prepared by the deadline. This Judge is watching this case too closely to miss a Court deadline and Plaintiffs counsel would just file their portion without us.

I am available if you have an update and my claims contact is on standby as well. Id like to discuss the potential amended settlement proposal with our client before EOD so we can finalize this case.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: David Atkinson David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 3:20 PM To: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Subject: RE: Sweatman v Zeeman - Consolidated Pretrial Order

I understand, but it is not my money. I left a message for the adjuster, but havent spoken to her.

I note the 4/3/23 scheduling order (which was amended in July to extend all deadlines 60 days) calls for the filing of the pretrial order on 10/31/23 and states the Court anticipates the case will be placed on a trial calendar the week of 9/12/23. I see no actual trial calendar. My assistant called the clerk last week after we received Lisas e-mail about the PTO and was told the case is not on a trial calendar. I think are all just assuming that we are on a calendar based on anticipates. If the staff attorney communicated something different, I havent seen an e-mail.

I am inclined to just ignore the 10/31/23 deadline and wait for the case to appear on a trial calendar. Maybe that will give our mutual client time to appreciate the value of the settlement you negotiated.

I suppose we could ask the Staff Attorney for guidance, which I am happy to do.

David Atkinson http://David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com/

404.888.6166

NOTICE: This email message and all attachments may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized transmittal. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality, including all privileges that may apply. Pursuant to those rights and privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies of the message and the attachments immediately. NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION. If you do not have a signed fee contract or engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your attorney.????

From: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 3:10 PM To: David Atkinson <David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com David.Atkinson@swiftcurrie.com > Subject: RE: Sweatman v Zeeman - Consolidated Pretrial Order

David,

I believe if you can get $3k in authority, we could get an agreement in place today. Also, if you have the $3k, I have additional authority to contribute more money so the proposed settlement amount is more evenly split. I know your retention is limited, like mine, but the cost of litigation more than justifies this and closes this case out.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for

Download Original (.msg)