Skip to content

Re Zeeman Discovery 29

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-Client
Confidence high
Reason Attorney Sally Monico seeking client approval on document language before sending to opposing counsel
Original File re-zeeman-discovery-29.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From szeeman@gmail.com
To Sally L. Monico
Subject Re: Zeeman Discovery
Date Zeeman Discovery
Email Body

He didn't present me with the surveys at the time...he just just said he did them.... didnt know if that is relevant. or not

". Zeeman did not agree to installation of the new fence as she disputed the findings of surveys presented by Sweatman and further understood the two feet in question, or the Disputed Property to be part of the Zeeman Property by either grant or adverse possession. "

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:14 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com szeeman@gmail.com > wrote:

still reading almost

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:14 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:

    Sarah, Im not concerned about the way drafted.

    You hired an attorney to represent you after there was a disagreement regarding the location of the boundary.  Thats the way I read it.

    Am I good to finalize and send to Sweatman counsel?

    Sally Monico
    11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
    Direct:  404.365.4506

    Main: 404.266.9171

    smonico@mmatllaw.com <mailto:smonico@mmatllaw.com>  *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS

    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
    No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

    From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > 
    Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:05 PM
    To: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> >
    Cc: Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com <mailto:ecoleman@wczlaw.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com <mailto:Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.com> >; Joanie J. Williams <jwilliams@wczlaw.com <mailto:jwilliams@wczlaw.com> >
    Subject: Re: Zeeman Discovery

    i hired the boundary lawyer right after the ultimatum- not before, does that matter?

    In early May 2021, Zeeman told Sweatman the land was hers through adverse possession and she hired a lawyer to represent her in the boundary line dispute. On August 7, 2021, Sweatman gave Zeeman an ultimatum

    On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:57 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:

        Changes made.  Finals attached.

        Sarah with your agreement/approval I will resolve all comments and finalize for submission.

        Thanks.

        Sally Monico
        11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
        Direct:  404.365.4506

        Main: 404.266.9171

        smonico@mmatllaw.com <mailto:smonico@mmatllaw.com>  *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS

        CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
        No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

        From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > 
        Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 4:51 PM
        To: Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com <mailto:ecoleman@wczlaw.com> >
        Cc: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com <mailto:Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.com> >; Joanie J. Williams <jwilliams@wczlaw.com <mailto:jwilliams@wczlaw.com> >
        Subject: Re: Zeeman Discovery

        RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5:

        Therefore, all windows were replaced in the same windowpane sills from original construction except the four windows in the breakfast nook area maintained the same sill outline of the four windows, and together they became a single flat window for a less obstructed view of the backyard including the ability to open at the bottom, all wi

Download Original (.msg)