Skip to content

Re Why Are There 2 Hearings In Two Weeks

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-Client
Confidence high
Reason Attorney Ledermeier responding to client Zeeman regarding court strategy and hearing attendance
Original File re-why-are-there-2-hearings-in-two-weeks.msg
File Type MSG

Email

Header Value
From /o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=1f4918a5604845759f64cd78928b4df1-Brett Leder
To Sarah Zeeman
Subject Re: Why are there 2 hearings in two weeks?
Date Why are there 2 hearings in two weeks?
Email Body

Why do you not want me to tell the court that they can enter an order to expedite? Also, you are welcome to attend; its via Zoom.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.


From: Sarah Zeeman szeeman@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 8:59:38 PM To: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Subject: Re: Why are there 2 hearings in two weeks?

No. I will be attending and I do not want your unilateral suggestion tomorrow.

->>>Why did you not follow up with me on Friday and only the court?

I do not trust a lot of what is going on here. I am not agreeing with your Sunday night shoving down my throat game plan- Emailing me 13 hours before court on a Sunday telling me to come to my own court hearing and dictating what Im doing with no discussion.

This is being mishandled on all sides.

Miramar purposely told me the wrong court date and has ignored all my emails since.

->Sweatman does not get to dictate how a surveyor performs his job.

I will be reporting the surveyors actions, emails, the on site recordings, and recorded phone calls.

This situation is unethical and Sweatmans council is not giving the transcript because they do not have them and they both of yall did not have the transcript at the site visit.

I recorded the site visit and will be able to confirm his council's unethical actions once I get the transcript

Its apparent, miramar failed to order the transcript in an adequate time frame after court 7 months later?? and Miramar from her emails continues to propose that I be represented in a blind fashion with a court order?

No.

I am not signing anything blind as Miramar is pushing for me to do so and will also be reporting her to the Florida Bar.

DeKalb county cannot do a court order over Brookhavens zoning. There have been changes to Brookhavens codes and and this will be going back to Brookhaven as 3 properties are be effected by this.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 7:41PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > wrote:

Sarah,

I hope all is well. I just wanted to let you know that we followed up with the Court reporter again on Friday regarding the transcript we havent received. Tomorrows hearing is via Zoom and you do not need to attend; its merely a status conference. That being said, opposing counsels refusal to give us the transcript and, more importantly, refusal to tell us if they are trying to proceed with a variance appeal over a Court Order for the impervious surface issue will absolutely be brought to the Judges attention; I am sick of their games and delays and this hearing marks the perfect opportunity to ensure that there arent any more games moving forward. I will also make sure to have a proposed order regarding the impervious surface issue and I am willing to bet that we will have an executed Order on that by the end of the week. Technically, its not our place to make Sweatman decide between seeking a variance/appeal and the Court Order route, which is why we didnt email the Court with the unilateral suggestion. That being said, I assure you that I will be making said unilateral suggestion tomorrow.

We can set up a call after the hearing. Please let me know your schedule and which number to call you on, if youd like a call, between 11AM and 1PM.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please let me know.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>  Smyrna, GA 30081 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>

11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+12

Download Original (.msg)