Re Fw Sweatman V. Zeeman 21Cv9795 12¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Correspondence > Attorney-Client |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | Email exchange between attorney Brett Ledermeier and client Sarah Zeeman regarding case status and settlement discussion |
| Original File | re-fw-sweatman-v.-zeeman-21cv9795-12.msg |
| File Type | MSG |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER |
| To | Sarah Zeeman |
| Subject | RE: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795 |
| Date | FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795 |
Email Body
Sarah,
Odysseys categorizing this as closed is irrelevant. The case is administratively closed which is indicated in the order. I believe Jeff has indicated the same to you.
Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation
Mailing: 850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009 Direct: 404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Sarah Zeeman szeeman@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 5:56 PM To: Brett Ledermeier bledermeier@mmatllaw.com Cc: Jeff Banks jeffsbanks@hotmail.com; Tania Tuttle ttuttle@mmatllaw.com Subject: Re: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Odyssey has it listed as closed.
I spoke to the court because you never said anything ever to me- they confirmed it was closed and not on the judges docket.
I have zero protection from the court - and per the transcripts exact words you have decided not to follow.
He needs to move the fence.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:52PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com bledermeier@mmatllaw.com > wrote:
Sarah,
The Judge reviewed the plat and we settled in court. The Judge was demanding the Order with the plat attached. Also, the case is administratively closed which was done by the Judge; this is not closed. We have no control over how the Court manages a case. Per the hearing, which you attended, they demanded that we meet the various deadlines and, upon receipt of the plat, stated that the case would be administratively closed pending final settlement. This does not impact any motion to enforce settlement or other filings which may be applicable.
Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation
Mailing: 850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g> Smyrna, GA 30081 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>
11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> Ste 125 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> Alpharetta, Ga 30009 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
Direct: 404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> >
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 5:41 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com <mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com> >
Subject: Re: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Help me understand - How is this fiduciary to me??
As the lawyer who signed off on this court order and you CLOSED MY CASE, when you clearly knew the judge was signing a court order stating she had reviewed a document, but that never occurred, and you still signed it anyway?
How is this fiduciary to me??