Wed 25 Jun 2025 13 10 28 0400 Re Closed Court Case 3 17 25 197A811D 2¶

The topography report you, Brett, provided is missing multiple parts of the
report.
https://prnt.sc/5VAaSTZ_h9_S

It should be like this below.
*Can I please have it? You paid $ 8,000 - the policyholder should at least
receive the correct documents that my policy covered.*
[image: Screenshot 2025-06-25 at 1.07.45 PM.png]

 Why won't you provide it? Why would you want to keep hiding this?


On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 1:01 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The topography report was already provided by Gaddy and I emailed to you
> as well. The topography report, further, has no impact on the new boundary
> line; it was a requirement for the plat to be submitted. The cantilever was
> not snuck in; it was holding up the plat and opposing counsel demanded it –
> both sides had numerous revisions and demands regarding the plat and the
> topography report and we spent extensive time meeting about the same.
>
>
>
> Case status: I did not close the case. I didn’t file a case disposition
> form; the staff attorney did. The Order states, clearly, that the case is
> administratively stayed which the Judge required per the last hearing on
> the same. I have not taken any improper action in this matter. Further, the
> matter is settled per the settlement agreement read into the May 2024
> transcript, as amended by substituting a survey for plat reconfiguration
> per Gaddy’s requirement and your request to proceed with using Gaddy for
> this resolution. Accordingly, the fence relocation can’t occur until the
> Plat is approved.
>
>
>
> I have been transparent throughout this process and advocated for you
> every step of the way. You also have private counsel in this matter; my
> retention was technically limited to the encroachments which are resolved
> by the new boundary line.
>
>
>
> I am happy to set up a call with you, Jeff, and David to discuss next
> steps if you’d like.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:51 PM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Closed Court Case 3/17/25
>
>
>
> I don't understand why my council, which paid $8000*, still won't provide
> me with a correctly signed topography report with a correct legend and all
> the trees labeled*. *Could you please get that for me**? *
>
>
>
> *Why can't I get it?*
>
>
>
> You will help the opposing party him schedule time for a surveyor that has
> been to his property multiple times -  Both parties clearly knew this was
> left off for 8 months, and sneak in a request directly to the surveyor
> before *you closed the case*....
>
>
>
>  I dunno, I guess you just felt like hiding it and not informing the
> policyholder of the truth..
>
>
>
> The case is closed - and *it has your name on it*...This was confirmed
> with the court; it is closed and not on the judge's docket. According to
> the court, you didn't follow the court's instructions.
>
>
>
> It is not protocol to close a case and then attempt to go back with a
> settlement agreement.  He's been trespassing on my property for 4 years. *He
> needs to move the fence; he is violating the court transcript.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:47 AM Brett Ledermeier <
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> I had nothing to do with the cantilever; this was brought to my attention
> by opposing counsel and she asked Gaddy to revise the plat so the structure
> was accurate. As for Todd, I did not retain his services – Gaddy did and I
> have not been involved in the approval/submission process; this is why we
> paid Gaddy to handle it on your behalf. As for the cantilever, it has no
> bearing on the settlement at all and was not kept from you. The plat should
> be accurate and Gaddy acknowledged that he missed it. Further, I have not
> hid anything from you. On the contrary, I have been trying to work with you
> to review/revise the settlement and get this finalized. Finally, as
> aforementioned, I d