Thank you, Eric, for the additional details. I located the other name
connecting the occurrences and dates.
We look forward to hearing Murray's response to the second question from
the beginning of this email:
- *Murray, do we have an ETA on when the rescue pups will be able to
safely enjoy their backyard by correcting the fence code violation of the
unfinished 2740 fence side? As discussed, the two abutting properties (2752
Gove and 2733 Osborne) have finished fence sides, but 2740 still does
not. Are code violations still ten days to remedy? If so, this code
violation equally qualifies for the same remedy timeframe. We eagerly look
forward to 2746 correcting their fence code violation and removing the
protruding fence nails at the dog's eye level.*
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:46 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
wrote:
> Murray Nicol is the site inspector who observed the additional work not
> shown on the site plan, however, the site is subject to be inspected in the
> future by a different one of our inspectors at the City’s discretion. Any
> of our inspectors will inspect for conformance to the site plan as it has
> been approved at the time of the requested inspection.
>
> The building inspectors are coordinated through the building department,
> so I don’t know which building inspector would be conducting the
> inspections for this permit.
>
> You may inquire by contacting City Hall, 404-637-0500 and ask to be
> connected with the building department.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 10:03 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Cc:* Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
> Who was the site inspector?
>
> Who was the building inspector?
>
>
>
> And the building inspector(s) did not discover what was built had
> surpassed the scope of the permitted plans, correct?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:54 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The building final inspection is conducted by the building inspectors who
> inspect the structural aspects of permit, framing, electrical, plumbing,
> HVAC, etc. The site inspections focus on the land, the topography and the
> vegetation, and any exterior improvements not falling under the building
> inspections purview. There is required a building final as well as a site
> final to be passed before a certificate of occupancy can be issued and the
> permit closed.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 9:07 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Cc:* Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Thank you, Eric, for the quick response. Is a "site inspection" the same
> thing as a "building final inspection"?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:55 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> wrote:
>
> The field inspector discovered the work to be beyond the scope of the
> approved site plan during a site inspection to the property and required
> the permittee to submit a revision for review of the additional work
> discovered. I cannot speak to the work of the extension, as you term it,
> only that additional work was discovered which was not shown on the
> original site plan.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 8:47 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>; Murray Nicol <
> murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Eric and Murray,
>
>
>
> Thank you for coming out in the cold weather to 2740 Grove Street on 1/7
> to view the damage and impacts of the code violations from 2746 Grove
> Street, which was built beyond the scope of their approved plans and
> permits.
>
> - Eric, you had mentioned in simple terms you busted 2746 for not
> constructing the extension per the approved plans. *When did COB
> discover this construction error?*
>
>
>
> - Murray, *do we have an ETA on when the rescue pups will be able to
> safely enjoy their backyard by correcting the fence code violation of the
> unfinished 2740 fence side? *As discussed, the two abutting
> properties (2752 Gove and 2733 Osborne) have finished fence sides, but 2740
> still does not.* Are code violations still ten days to remedy*? If* so*
> ,* this code violation equally qualifies for the
> same remedy timeframe.* We eagerly look forward to 2746 correcting
> their fence code violation and removing the protruding fence nails at the
> dog's eye level.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of th