Thank you for the clarification.
Who was the site inspector?
Who was the building inspector?
And the building inspector(s) did not discover what was built had
surpassed the scope of the permitted plans, correct?
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:54 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
wrote:
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The building final inspection is conducted by the building inspectors who
> inspect the structural aspects of permit, framing, electrical, plumbing,
> HVAC, etc. The site inspections focus on the land, the topography and the
> vegetation, and any exterior improvements not falling under the building
> inspections purview. There is required a building final as well as a site
> final to be passed before a certificate of occupancy can be issued and the
> permit closed.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 9:07 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Cc:* Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Thank you, Eric, for the quick response. Is a "site inspection" the same
> thing as a "building final inspection"?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:55 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> wrote:
>
> The field inspector discovered the work to be beyond the scope of the
> approved site plan during a site inspection to the property and required
> the permittee to submit a revision for review of the additional work
> discovered. I cannot speak to the work of the extension, as you term it,
> only that additional work was discovered which was not shown on the
> original site plan.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 8:47 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>; Murray Nicol <
> murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Eric and Murray,
>
>
>
> Thank you for coming out in the cold weather to 2740 Grove Street on 1/7
> to view the damage and impacts of the code violations from 2746 Grove
> Street, which was built beyond the scope of their approved plans and
> permits.
>
> - Eric, you had mentioned in simple terms you busted 2746 for not
> constructing the extension per the approved plans. *When did COB
> discover this construction error?*
>
>
>
> - Murray, *do we have an ETA on when the rescue pups will be able to
> safely enjoy their backyard by correcting the fence code violation of the
> unfinished 2740 fence side? *As discussed, the two abutting
> properties (2752 Gove and 2733 Osborne) have finished fence sides, but 2740
> still does not.* Are code violations still ten days to remedy*? If* so*
> ,* this code violation equally qualifies for the
> same remedy timeframe.* We eagerly look forward to 2746 correcting
> their fence code violation and removing the protruding fence nails at the
> dog's eye level.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please contact the sender and destroy
> all copies of the original message (including attachments). The City of
> Brookhaven is a public entity subject to the Official Code of Georgia
> Annotated §§ 50-18-70 to 50-18-76 concerning public records. Email is
> covered under such laws and thus may be subject to disclosure.
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>