Mon 10 Jan 2022 09 06 53 050 Re 2746 Grove Street 17E44503
| Field | Value |
| Category | Permits & Municipal > Municipal Correspondence |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | [sonnet] Zeeman emailing City of Brookhaven officials about permit violations at 2746 |
| Original File | mon_10_jan_2022_09_06_53_-050_re_2746_grove_street_17e44503.eml |
| File Type | EML |
| Source | gmail-export |
mon_10_jan_2022_09_06_53_-050_re_2746_grove_street_17e44503.eml
Email
| Header | Value |
| From | Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> |
| To | Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov> |
| CC | Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov> |
| Subject | Re: 2746 Grove Street |
| Date | Mon, 10 Jan 2022 09:06:53 -0500 |
Email Body
Thank you, Eric, for the quick response. Is a "site inspection" the same
thing as a "building final inspection"?
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:55 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
wrote:
> The field inspector discovered the work to be beyond the scope of the
> approved site plan during a site inspection to the property and required
> the permittee to submit a revision for review of the additional work
> discovered. I cannot speak to the work of the extension, as you term it,
> only that additional work was discovered which was not shown on the
> original site plan.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 8:47 AM
> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>; Murray Nicol <
> murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
> *Subject:* 2746 Grove Street
>
>
>
> Eric and Murray,
>
>
>
> Thank you for coming out in the cold weather to 2740 Grove Street on 1/7
> to view the damage and impacts of the code violations from 2746 Grove
> Street, which was built beyond the scope of their approved plans and
> permits.
>
> - Eric, you had mentioned in simple terms you busted 2746 for not
> constructing the extension per the approved plans. *When did COB
> discover this construction error?*
>
>
>
> - Murray, *do we have an ETA on when the rescue pups will be able to
> safely enjoy their backyard by correcting the fence code violation of the
> unfinished 2740 fence side? *As discussed, the two abutting
> properties (2752 Gove and 2733 Osborne) have finished fence sides, but 2740
> still does not.* Are code violations still ten days to remedy*? If* so*
> ,* this code violation equally qualifies for the
> same remedy timeframe.* We eagerly look forward to 2746 correcting
> their fence code violation and removing the protruding fence nails at the
> dog's eye level.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please contact the sender and destroy
> all copies of the original message (including attachments). The City of
> Brookhaven is a public entity subject to the Official Code of Georgia
> Annotated §§ 50-18-70 to 50-18-76 concerning public records. Email is
> covered under such laws and thus may be subject to disclosure.
>
Download Original (.eml)