Thu 27 Jan 2022 08 32 12 050 Fwd 2746 Grove Street 17E9Bbc8¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Permits & Municipal > Inspections & Enforcement |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | [sonnet] Zeeman forwarding emails about code enforcement violations at 2746 Grove Street |
| Original File | thu_27_jan_2022_08_32_12_-050_fwd_2746_grove_street_17e9bbc8.eml |
| File Type | EML |
| Source | gmail-export |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> |
| To | Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov> |
| Subject | Fwd: 2746 Grove Street |
| Date | Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:32:12 -0500 |
Email Body
The email you couldn't recall.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 8:55 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> wrote:
>
> The field inspector discovered the work to be beyond the scope of the
> approved site plan during a site inspection to the property and required
> the permittee to submit a revision for review of the additional work
> discovered. I cannot speak to the work of the extension, as you term it,
> only that additional work was discovered which was not shown on the
> original site plan.
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: 2746 Grove Street
To: Murray Nicol <Murray.Nicol@brookhavenga.gov>, Eric Long <
eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
Hi Murray,
As we discussed on Friday in front of a guest at my home, first how 2746
was built beyond the scope of the permit and COB is aware of this, but we
also addressed how Code enforcement did not apply code *Sec.* *27-955* equally
and fairly to the 3 abutting properties.
- Property 1
- Unfinished fence side 2740 Grove Street - screenshot:
https://prnt.sc/26c6kfm
- Property 2
- Finished fence side 2752 Grove Street - screenshot:
https://prnt.sc/26c6c0c
- Property 3
- Finished fence side 2733 Osborne- screenshot: https://prnt.sc/26c6ch8
*Could you please explain why 1 property fence side (2740) does not
follow the code for the finished side and the other two properties
correctly follow the code **Sec.* *27-955**?*
As for nails: Code enforcement was sent pictures of the 2740 unfinished
fence & nails via code ticket ID# 2395207
*Nails **Screenshot from ticket:** https://prnt.sc/26c6g6x
<https://prnt.sc/26c6g6x> *
My email at that time stated that the mapping system in the Brookhaven
connect was mislabeling the addresses when entering a ticket -
screenshot of the email: https://prnt.sc/26c6gz1 but instead the ticket
was labeled as a duplicate but the *nails photo had been viewed
and disregarded *as code enforcement had mentioned* nails in all caps *in
the ticket: <http://goog_371872786>
https://brookhavenga.citysourced.com/servicerequests/2395202
*We look forward to the entire side of the fence facing 2740 being
correctly finished following code Sec. 27-955 and applied in the exact
same and equal manner as the other abutting properties (2752 and 2733).*
Best regards,
Sarah
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:10 PM Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
wrote:
> Sarah,
>
> I checked ,and Code Enforcement has already addressed the finish side of
> the fence ,and found no violation.
> I didn’t observe the protruding nails that you spoke about, but I will
> contact the fence owner and ask them to correct any protruding nails.
> If You would like to send pictures of the nails or have me come and look
> again that would be fine.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Murray Nicol
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2022, at 11:01 AM, Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Thank you, Eric, for the additional details. I located the other name
> connecting the occurrences and dates.
>
> We look forward to hearing Murray's response to the second question from
> the beginning of this email:
>
> - *Murray, do we have an ETA on when the rescue pups will be able to
> safely enjoy their backyard by correcting the fence code violation of the
> unfinished 2740 fence side? As discussed, the two abutting properties (2752
> Gove and 2733 Osborne) have finished fence sides, but 2740 still does
> not. Are code violations still ten days to remedy? If so, this code
> violation equally qualifies for the same remedy timeframe. We eagerly look
> forward to 2746 correcting their fence code violation and removing the
> protruding fence nails at the dog's eye level.*
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:46 AM Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> Murray Nicol is the site inspector who observed the additional work not
>> shown on the site plan, however, the site is subject to be inspected in the
>> future by a different one of our inspectors at the City’s discretion. Any
>> of our inspectors will inspect for conformance to the site plan as it has
>> been approved at the time of the requested inspection.
>>
>> The building inspectors are coordinated through the building department,
>> so I don’t know which building inspector would be conducting the
>> inspections for this permit.
>>
>> You may inquire by contacting City Hall, 404-637-0500 and ask to be
>> connected with the building department.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 10:03 AM
>> *To:* Eric Long <eric.long@brookhavenga.gov>
>> *Cc:* Murray Nicol <murray.nicol@brookhavenga.gov>
>> *Subject:* Re: 2746 Grove Street
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the clarification.
>>
>> Who was the site inspector?
>>
>> Who was the building inspector?
>>
>>
>>
>> And the building inspector(s) did not discover what was built had
>> su
Attachments¶
2752 Grove finished fence side by 2746 Grove.HEIC (image/heif, 2 MB)
2733 Osborne finished fence side by 2746 Grove.HEIC (image/heif, 1 MB)
2740 Grove unfinished fence side by 2746.jpeg (image/jpeg, 3 MB)
