Skip to content

Fri 1 Apr 2022 17 43 39 0000 Re Blue Surveyor Signature Disclaimer 17Fe639C 2

Field Value
Category Surveys & Plans > Surveys & Plats
Confidence medium
Reason [sonnet] Email from MMATLLAW discussing blue surveyor signature disclaimer
Original File fri_1_apr_2022_17_43_39_0000_re_blue_surveyor_signature_disclaimer_17fe639c_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
fri_1_apr_2022_17_43_39_0000_re_blue_surveyor_signature_disclaimer_17fe639c_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From "Sally L. Monico" <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
To Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
CC Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject RE: Blue Surveyor signature disclaimer?
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:43:39 +0000
Email Body
I would lean towards omitting the below and waiting for the surveyor to discuss.

Depending on the results of the survey we will have to supplement our responses anyway.


Sally Monico
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
Direct:  404.365.4506
Main: 404.266.9171
smonico@mmatllaw.com<mailto:smonico@mmatllaw.com> *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS


[cid:image001.jpg@01D845CE.12F7D140]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.



From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: Re: Blue Surveyor signature disclaimer?

Thank you for explaining that. I know Eric is currently reviewing - but as another question -

Would it be more helpful to omit this comment, since this is my assumption - I don't know if saying less is better in these types of situations etc?

Zeeman has since learned that the two rebar corner pins have been missing on the Osborne side of the property since the City of Brookhaven did work in the Right of Way which could explain the difference in Sweatman's Surveys and the migration of the corner pin on Grove Street.


On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:21 AM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com<mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com>> wrote:
Sarah,

It just depends on the purpose and scope of the survey.  If they survey was never intended to be recorded it may not need a blue ink signature or certification.  It doesn't mean the survey is necessarily wrong or unreliable.

Surveyors can prepare drawings, retracements, ect. for a host of different purposes.  If the scope of one survey is to identify the boundary line then it may not show the location of easements or any utilities.  That's why outlining the scope and purpose of the survey work ordered at the outset is so important.  If the new survey we obtain varies from prior surveys and records Mr. Chastain will make note of those differences and his opinions as to same.


Sally Monico
11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
Direct:  404.365.4506
Main: 404.266.9171
smonico@mmatllaw.com<mailto:smonico@mmatllaw.com> *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS


[cid:image001.jpg@01D845CE.12F7D140]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.



From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com<mailto:szeeman@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 10:35 AM
To: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com<mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com>>
Subject: Blue Surveyor signature disclaimer?

Does it matter that the disclaimer on the survey talks about a blue ink signature?

https://prnt.sc/iW6H_O6WPP1Z

 I also never received a physical copy of the survey illegally ordered, by the 1st attorney(attached)

 Also attached the variance approval survey with no sewer easement included and no blue ink.






Smokeball Reference: 5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8/d0037fe9-0297-4187-a657-9b4533036456.

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

Download Original (.eml)