Wed 5 Feb 2025 22 38 24 0000 Re External Re Voided Settlement Check Request To Re Issue 194D843C 2¶

Sarah,

I would strongly advise against asking the Judge. The deadlines, per the Order, are all within the next week. The Judge explicitly gives them time to go the variance route if they choose and if we ask for money before execution, I do not see the Judge granting that without sufficient cause. We would need to show it’s necessary to effectuate the settlement.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[cid:image001.jpg@01DB77F4.94F659E0]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 5:32 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Eric Zeni <eric.zeni@stewart.com>; Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>; Marimar Soltero <Marimar.Soltero@stewart.com>; Melissa Taylor <melissa.taylor@stewart.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Voided settlement check - Request to re-issue and mail with tracking

Let’s request it to the  Judge/court.

They are the ones holding it up.
The ball has been in their court for months to decide which way to do the settlement agreement .

His lawyer lied to the judge about the Stakes not being performed as an attempt to take advantage of my insurance resources for a frivolous unnecessary surveyor re-visit to re-stake.

They  have the impervious  issue & was a non-conforming lot before he started the lawsuit

Plus- they’re holding my settlement check hostage.

 Can you also ask the judge that  he remove the strings, They are unnecessary for 4+ years and  now we have stakes. Or should i go add my own string too… 😎

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 4:07 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>> wrote:
Sarah,

The request was objected to and I also just went through the transcript. In the transcript, the Judge says that the funds are released once the settlement is signed “within a reasonable amount of time”. If they don’t consent, we would need to ask the Judge.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 |<https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g> Smyrna, GA 30081<https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>
11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  Ste 125<https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>   | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>   Alpharetta, Ga 30009<https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
Direct:  404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[cid:image001.jpg@01DB77F4.94F659E0]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com<mailto:szeeman@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 3:40 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>>
Cc: Eric Zeni <eric.zeni@stewart.com<mailto:eric.zeni@stewart.com>>; Jeff Banks <j