Wed 25 Jun 2025 12 51 10 0400 Re Closed Court Case 3 17 25 197A8002 2¶

I don't understand why my council, which paid $8000*, still won't provide
me with a correctly signed topography report with a correct legend and all
the trees labeled*. *Could you please get that for me? *

*Why can't I get it?*

You will help the opposing party him schedule time for a surveyor that has
been to his property multiple times -  Both parties clearly knew this was
left off for 8 months, and sneak in a request directly to the surveyor
before *you closed the case*....

 I dunno, I guess you just felt like hiding it and not informing the
policyholder of the truth..

The case is closed - and *it has your name on it*...This was confirmed with
the court; it is closed and not on the judge's docket. According to the
court, you didn't follow the court's instructions.

It is not protocol to close a case and then attempt to go back with a
settlement agreement.  He's been trespassing on my property for 4 years. *He
needs to move the fence; he is violating the court transcript.*



On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:47 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
>
>
> I had nothing to do with the cantilever; this was brought to my attention
> by opposing counsel and she asked Gaddy to revise the plat so the structure
> was accurate. As for Todd, I did not retain his services – Gaddy did and I
> have not been involved in the approval/submission process; this is why we
> paid Gaddy to handle it on your behalf. As for the cantilever, it has no
> bearing on the settlement at all and was not kept from you. The plat should
> be accurate and Gaddy acknowledged that he missed it. Further, I have not
> hid anything from you. On the contrary, I have been trying to work with you
> to review/revise the settlement and get this finalized. Finally, as
> aforementioned, I didn’t close the case; the staff attorney filed a case
> disposition form without anyone’s knowledge.
>
>
>
> I am hopeful that we can focus on the case resolution and move forward
> with finalizing the settlement, executing the deeds, and ensuring that you
> receive the settlement funds in a timely manner. The case “status” online
> has no bearing on the settlement; a motion to enforce can always be filed.
> From a legal standpoint, you are protected and we continue to advocate for
> you, looking out for your best interest.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2025 6:29 AM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Closed Court Case 3/17/25
>
>
>
> Your actions occurred back in March, and the policyholder was never
> informed that this ever happened. I stated in writing that I don't
> understand what is going on when you wrote  a bold-faced misrepresentation
> of a canetelieber being "forgotten" was utterly untrue.
>
>
>
> *Why would you not tell the truth - you had been working on the
> cantilever for over a month?*
>
>
>
> *What are you hiding?*
>
>
>
> * How is your zero-communication about what you were doing to when you
> closed the case, fiduciary to the policyholder?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 5:30 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The Order was to get the plat approved and it merely stated that we had a
> settlement. There has been no lie or fabrication of any sort in this
> matter. The Order was outlined in a prior email last week, in detail, as to
> what the reference was to settlement agreement and why the Court hadn’t
> reviewed any settlement agreement; I also outlined the reason “settlement
> agreement” was not a capitalized term. Maybe we should have a call to
> discuss so that I can clarify any remaining questions?
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDE