Skip to content

Tue 8 Mar 2022 19 19 44 0500 Re Plat Bk 96 Page 14 17F6C0Bc 2

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason [sonnet] Email discussing plat bk 96 and boundary encroachment defense strategy
Original File tue_8_mar_2022_19_19_44_-0500_re_plat_bk_96_page_14_17f6c0bc_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
tue_8_mar_2022_19_19_44_-0500_re_plat_bk_96_page_14_17f6c0bc_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To "Sally L. Monico" <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
CC Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>, "Richard J. Capriola" <Rcapriola@wczlaw.com>, Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: plat bk 96 page 14
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2022 19:19:44 -0500
Email Body
Bigger notes from Sally's PB
https://prnt.sc/E6uQXvCUnWIe
https://prnt.sc/SKjjNWe9_JTq


On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:56 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> So you’re saying  the hard to read notes stating the entire boundary line
> has a 6ft cedar fence
>
> ( as Letter” I”listed the right hand side of the original recorded plat bk
> page you attached)
>
>  don’t mean anything, correct?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:10 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>
>> Full copy attached.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sarah, the notes are of no real consequence as the recorded plat does not
>> show the encroachments at issue in the litigation.  As I mentioned in my
>> prior email the metes and bounds description of your property in the 2021
>> survey are consistent with the recorded plat, and the 1994 survey provided
>> to you at closing (within the margin of error).  Our best defense to the
>> claims raised by is that the encroachments have existed in the same place
>> for the necessary statutory period, which is the position we have taken in
>> our answer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sally Monico*
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive+%7C+Ste.+125+%7C+Alpharetta,+Georgia+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Direct:  404.365.4506
>>
>> Main: 404.266.9171
>>
>> smonico@mmatllaw.com **PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 8, 2022 5:53 PM
>> *To:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>; Sally L. Monico <
>> SCook@mmatllaw.com>
>> *Subject:* RE: plat bk 96 page 14
>>
>>
>>
>> Sarah,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there any way to scan this or maybe get a better picture? It came
>> through very blurry on my end.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Lucy Aquino* <http://Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com/>
>>
>> 404.888.6202
>>
>> NOTICE:  This email message and all attachments may contain legally
>> privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee.
>> If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its
>> attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized
>> transmittal.  Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality,
>> including all privileges that may apply.  Pursuant to those rights and
>> privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute
>> or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this
>> message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies
>> of the message and the attachments immediately.  NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR
>> CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION.  If you do not have a signed fee contract or
>> engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your
>> attorney.​
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 8, 2022 5:49 PM
>> *To:* Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>; Sally L. Monico <
>> SCook@mmatllaw.com>
>> *Subject:* plat bk 96 page 14
>>
>>
>>
>> This is from the plat bk 96 page 14 I got from the courthouse
>>
>>
>>
>> Does either one help me?
>>
>>
>>
>> A) The letter "I" on the 1st picture references the 6-foot cedar fence
>> screening the entire property line-
>>
>>
>>
>> B)  #3 & #4 in the general notes about the 10 ft drainage easement
>> between all lots and perimeter boundary lines?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Smokeball Reference:
>> 5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8/2037e0d5-d3d7-43c0-bb09-c66e150bdaa0.
>>
>

Attachments

image003.jpg (image/jpeg, 36 KB)

image003.jpg

image002.jpg (image/jpeg, 37 KB)

image002.jpg

image004.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image004.jpg

image001.png (image/png, 1 KB)

image001.png

Download Original (.eml)