Skip to content

Tue 20 Aug 2024 12 41 28 0400 Re Update Request 2740 Grove Street Ne Brookhaven Ga 30319 19170Aa3 2

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason [sonnet] Client emailing attorney about re-platting survey settlement progress
Original File tue_20_aug_2024_12_41_28_-0400_re_update_request_2740_grove_street_ne_brookhaven_ga_30319_19170aa3_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
tue_20_aug_2024_12_41_28_-0400_re_update_request_2740_grove_street_ne_brookhaven_ga_30319_19170aa3_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
CC "eric.zeni@stewart.com" <eric.zeni@stewart.com>, Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: Update Request: 2740 Grove Street NE Brookhaven, GA 30319
Date Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:41:28 -0400
Email Body
Hi Brett,

Is there an update since your email on 8/8?
The court hearing is in 6 days.

Best,
Sarah

On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:04 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
>
>
> I have been in communication with Gaddy each week and providing him
> additional details to submit the formal proposal today. As for the hearing,
> you will not need to be present. It’s a status hearing and I will email the
> Court the delay with the survey complexities and County and City
> requirements causing the delay due to their recent ordinances and zoning
> rules. The work Gaddy would be doing is re-platting the property lines
> which, given the location of the homes (both physical and in the City of
> Brookhaven/unincorporated DeKalb County), which requires topography scans,
> impervious surface measurements/inspection to ensure they are below 35%,
> permitting to change the tax assessor maps, and a three (3) page
> compilation of the original survey, topography, and proposed
> re-platting/subdivision survey that will then become the controlling plat
> for both properties.
>
>
>
> Again, it is complex and the technical aspect of the equipment used would
> best be explained by Gaddy. He estimates the surveys to take roughly 6
> hours per property.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 8, 2024 10:40 AM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>; eric.zeni@stewart.com
> *Subject:* Re: Update Request: 2740 Grove Street NE Brookhaven, GA 30319
>
>
>
> Mr. Ledermeier,
>
>
>
> Can I please get an update?
>
>
>
> There has been no response to my questions for over a week and my
> voicemail was not answered.
>
>
>
> It’s my understanding nothing has been scheduled with Gaddy and at this
> point in time I will have to request be absent from my job for the upcoming
> court hearing for which we have no survey?
>
>
>
> Please advise, thank you.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 8:10 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> Was checking in on these questions.
>
>
>
> Also, I would like to add question #5
>
>
>
> I have to submit a request to my employer for additional time off of work
> to attend this new court hearing that I discovered online; what exactly is
> being presented to the court, and for my edification,  is this the standard
> protocol two months+ after our court appearance and settlement at court?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:45 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
>
>
> As you stated above,
>
> *The Agreement itself will be required to incorporate the new
> survey/subdivision plat, tax assessor amendment, and potentially permitting
> documents. Gaddy outlined why the survey is not just a standard survey; it
> is rather technical, but it does ensure that everything is completed in
> accordance with DeKalb and City of Brookhaven code.*
>
>
>
> Can you provide more details on:
>
> 1. What this is ( in a simpler explanation)
>
> 2. What was Gaddy's outline
>
> 3. What are the "technical" parts
>
> 4. What is the difference between a standard survey and what Gaddy  (who
> has been working with and surveying Brookhaven and Dekalb for decades) is
> proposing needs to be done?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:41 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> I received your voicemail; I am on a conference call. I spoke with Gaddy,
> in length, and I am waiting for a formal quote/proposal with scope of work;
> he was supposed to send it over today – I will follow up. The Court date is
> only a status hearing to see where the settlement stands. If the parties
> agree, we can always dismiss the case without prejudice pending the
> settlement execution. The Agreement itself will be required to incorporate
> the new survey/subdivision plat, tax assessor amendment, and, potentially,
> permitting documents. Gaddy outlined why the survey is not just a standard
> survey and it is rather technical, but it does ensure that e

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

Download Original (.eml)