Skip to content

Re Revisions To Settlement Agreement Re Sweatman V Zeeman 16

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason Settlement negotiation email discussing revisions to settlement agreement
Original File re-revisions-to-settlement-agreement-re-sweatman-v-zeeman-16.msg
File Type MSG
Source hdd-1
re-revisions-to-settlement-agreement-re-sweatman-v-zeeman-16.msg

Email

Header Value
From /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER
To Lisa Rose
Subject RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman
Date revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman
Email Body
Lisa, 



Are you free for a call on this today?



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately. 



From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 12:19 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com>
Subject: RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman



Brett,



You are correct about the Easement Agreement, and I thought that was deleted, but I see it is included in Section 2.1. You can remove the Easement language only.



As to the penalty provision, you and I discussed options available to my client given Zeemans defiant behavior to identify to you as her counsel, the alleged code violations.  



Her new counsel, David Stuart, also has not provided any verification/certification as to the alleged code violations.



Jonathan insists on the penalty because of your clients conduct.





-Lisa









Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC


Mailing:   4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
O: 678.806.8188 <tel:770.231.9783>   E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer  <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>  W: www.roselitigation.lawyer <http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 


This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.







From: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> > 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 12:14 PM
To: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> >
Cc: Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com <mailto:tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com> >
Subject: RE: revisions to Settlement Agreement re: Sweatman v Zeeman



Lisa, 



You and I previously had a call to discuss the revisions and specifically discussed the alleged code violations. It was my understanding that we agreed there wouldnt be a monetary penalty added into the settlement as we know it wont be agreed to and will further delay settlement. Also, I saw the easement language still in there. The fence will be on your client's property, so there is no need for any easement; I thought we were in agreement with this on our last call as well. 



Before I circulate for further review, please let me know if you want to delete the monetary penalty provision and easement language. 



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

image002.png (image/png, 3 KB)

image002.png

Download Original (.msg)