Skip to content

Re Fw Sweatman V. Zeeman 21Cv9795 11

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason Attorney discusses settlement agreement as strategy to compel fence movement
Original File re-fw-sweatman-v.-zeeman-21cv9795-11.msg
File Type MSG
Source hdd-1
re-fw-sweatman-v.-zeeman-21cv9795-11.msg

Email

Header Value
From /O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=1F4918A5604845759F64CD78928B4DF1-BRETT LEDER
To Sarah Zeeman
Subject RE: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Date FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795
Email Body
Sarah, 



I am more than happy to push for him to move the fence ASAP; well in advance of the City/County approval of the plat. That being said, the only chance I have at making the demand come to fruition is if we have a finalized settlement agreement ready for execution. Is this something that you can assist me with? It would be the only alternative legal argument to make in order to mandate that the fence be moved prior to final approval of the plat. Thinking long-term, their response will be that a re-platting was demanded, and a plat is not a survey, which is why they have not moved the fence. Its a hyper technical distinction and not worth the time and expense to fight over, so a finalized settlement agreement is the best bet we have to get the fence moved. 



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately. 



From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:47 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795



He needs to Move the fence



You are not following the exact words of the transcript and you keep lying to me  ie the cantilever was a flat out lie that I just learned about. - help me understand how that is fiduciary??







On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 6:19PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:

    For clarity, the Court Order uses settlement agreement as a non-capitalized, non-defined term; it is used in the general sense to indicate that the Judge is aware the parties have reached a resolution as it was read into the transcript at court. It is not referring to any specific settlement agreement and the settlement agreement draft was never sent to the Court. What we are doing with the settlement agreement draft is to memorialize the agreement all parties reached. We needed the Court Order in order to effectuate the settlement due to the non-conformities and to expedite the City/County approval of the plat as strongly suggested by Gaddy which you were aware of. This is the same as someone filing a Notice of Settlement which stays a case pending the parties memorializing their agreement into a written document. Formal settlement agreements arent reviewed by the Judge unless there has been a breach and someone files a motion to enforce. 



    In our case, the Judge was aware of the potential, complex issues with the variance appeal and time frame to resolve the case. A Judge is not going to take the case off of a calendar unless there is a document indicating the parties settled, which is what this is. 



    The Court only reviewed this Order and the attached plat.



    Please let me know if you need further clarity. 



    Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
    Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


    Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g>  Smyrna, GA 30081 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/850+Windy+Hill+Road+%7C+Unit+1762+%7C+Smyrna,+GA+30081?entry=gmail&source=g> 

    11625 Rainwater Drive <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>  Ste 125 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>    | <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>   Alpharetta, Ga 30009 <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g> 
    Direct:  404.365.4564

    Main: 770.200.7000

    bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
    No attorney-cli

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

image002.png (image/png, 3 KB)

image002.png

image003.jpg (image/jpeg, 7 KB)

image003.jpg

Download Original (.msg)