Skip to content

Fri 2 Aug 2024 08 10 08 0400 Re Update Request 2740 Grove Street Ne Brookhaven Ga 30319 19112Ff5 2

Field Value
Category Settlement > Correspondence
Confidence high
Reason [sonnet] Attorney-client email discussing settlement status, survey/plat requirements
Original File fri_2_aug_2024_08_10_08_-0400_re_update_request_2740_grove_street_ne_brookhaven_ga_30319_19112ff5_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
fri_2_aug_2024_08_10_08_-0400_re_update_request_2740_grove_street_ne_brookhaven_ga_30319_19112ff5_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>, eric.zeni@stewart.com
Subject Re: Update Request: 2740 Grove Street NE Brookhaven, GA 30319
Date Fri, 02 Aug 2024 08:10:08 -0400
Email Body
Good morning,
Was checking in on these questions.

Also, I would like to add question #5

I have to submit a request to my employer for additional time off of work
to attend this new court hearing that I discovered online; what exactly is
being presented to the court, and for my edification,  is this the standard
protocol two months+ after our court appearance and settlement at court?

Best,
Sarah

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:45 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> As you stated above,
> *The Agreement itself will be required to incorporate the new
> survey/subdivision plat, tax assessor amendment, and potentially permitting
> documents. Gaddy outlined why the survey is not just a standard survey; it
> is rather technical, but it does ensure that everything is completed in
> accordance with DeKalb and City of Brookhaven code.*
>
> Can you provide more details on:
> 1. What this is ( in a simpler explanation)
> 2. What was Gaddy's outline
> 3. What are the "technical" parts
> 4. What is the difference between a standard survey and what Gaddy  (who
> has been working with and surveying Brookhaven and Dekalb for decades) is
> proposing needs to be done?
>
> Best,
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:41 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sarah,
>>
>>
>>
>> I received your voicemail; I am on a conference call. I spoke with Gaddy,
>> in length, and I am waiting for a formal quote/proposal with scope of work;
>> he was supposed to send it over today – I will follow up. The Court date is
>> only a status hearing to see where the settlement stands. If the parties
>> agree, we can always dismiss the case without prejudice pending the
>> settlement execution. The Agreement itself will be required to incorporate
>> the new survey/subdivision plat, tax assessor amendment, and, potentially,
>> permitting documents. Gaddy outlined why the survey is not just a standard
>> survey and it is rather technical, but it does ensure that everything is
>> completed in accordance with DeKalb and City of Brookhaven code.
>>
>>
>>
>> Once I have the quote, I will submit it for approval. Based on my call
>> with Gaddy, it’s estimated to cost substantially more than the survey from
>> the surveyor that Plaintiff and your prior counsel used. I understand you
>> have raised issue with using Land Express as they were on the witness list
>> for Plaintiff, and I have relayed those concerns to Stewart.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for the deposition, we did not set the deposition and never discussed
>> the payment for the deposition, but I can send it for review. I can’t opine
>> on any coverage related questions, so please reach out to Stewart regarding
>> the same. I can, however, forward the invoice and request to Marimar.
>>
>>
>>
>> As soon as I have an update, I will let you know.
>>
>>
>>
>> If there’s anything else, please let me know.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
>> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>>
>>
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
>> Direct:  404.365.4564
>>
>> Main: 770.200.7000
>>
>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 29, 2024 8:00 AM
>> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>; eric.zeni@stewart.com
>> *Subject:* Update Request: 2740 Grove Street NE Brookhaven, GA 30319
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Ledermeier,
>>
>>
>>
>> Could I please get an update, and could you help me understand what is
>> happening?
>>
>> 1. *Dekalb County court hearing scheduled for August 26th, 2024? - **FILED
>> 7/17/2024*
>>
>> I learned about the upcoming court hearing over the weekend when I logged
>> into the DeKalb County court case portal. My court settlement for Adverse
>> possession by prescription before Senior Judge David B. Irwin was back
>> in May 2024. What is this, and why do I have to go back to court again?
>> (Court notification attached)
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. The outstanding payment of *$3,138.52* has been due for the
>> deposition of the plaintiff, Jonathan Sweatman, since 2023; I have already
>> covered my part last year for 1 of the 2 deposition bills they provided,
>> Mr Ledermeier; when will Stewart be paying this half? (Outstanding Bill
>> Attached)
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. The

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

Download Original (.eml)