Skip to content

Wed 5 Feb 2025 13 28 21 0500 Re Violation Of Court Terms 60 Days Moving The Fence 194D75Ec 2

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence medium
Reason Email subject indicates court term violation regarding fence movement; likely attorney communication about compliance
Original File wed_5_feb_2025_13_28_21_-0500_re_violation_of_court_terms_-_60_days_moving_the_fence_194d75ec_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
wed_5_feb_2025_13_28_21_-0500_re_violation_of_court_terms_-_60_days_moving_the_fence_194d75ec_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: Violation of court terms - 60 days moving the fence
Date Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:28:21 -0500
Email Body
Video link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jr4fICtaIRDHpihJkDR1O54lGz-cqImO/view

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:22 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> I am unable to load that video format. The fence can’t be moved until a
> final line is confirmed by all parties and Gaddy required that we do a
> re-platting, not just a survey. It technically modified the terms, but the
> 60 days still applies. Ultimately, a draft is not a final version and it is
> implicit in a settlement that to move personal property such as a fence, it
> would require that the plat be finalized.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 5, 2025 12:08 PM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Violation of court terms - 60 days moving the fence
>
>
>
>
>
> It is a signed plat by a surveyor, not a final plat. The word "*final"* is
> misrepresented every time it is used., it is not a "final" plat. Conditions
> outside the homes were not the final lot configuration when it was signed
> on 10/11/24, and still not.
>
>
>
> **Additionally, a 3rd violation, Sweatman,* informed everyone  on Monday
> 2/3 of his 30 inches of buried underground cement. *
>
> Buried cement is artificial and changes the natural water flow to my yard,
> as shown in the pooling of water in the attached picture.
>
> *page 49 line 7, no artificial redirection of water *
>
>
>
>  How is the court notified of this violation?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Also, in my other email, you explained clearly in court how cameras
> recording me in my backyard, would be against the law. This is his 1st
> violation,*
>
>  How is the court notified of this violation?
>
> *page 49 line 23*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:30 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The court terms are not written to what you are stating.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:07 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The final plat will not be received until it is approved by the City and
> County; only then is it considered final as a certification approving it is
> a requirement in order for it to be recorded as the new plat. This is not a
> violation, but I understand the position. I can try to push that they move
> the fence within sixty days of receipt of the revised, final plat as
> discussed at Monday’s meeting. I know Gaddy said we would have it the next
> day, but I have not received it yet.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 5, 2025 7:45 AM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Violation of court terms - 60 days moving the fence
>
>
>
> Exact words from Page 41 of the court terms.
>
>
>
> * the fence will be relocated six -- within 60 days after the receipt of
> the new survey. *
>
>
>
> A* new survey* was stamped and provided to the opposing party 10/21/24
>
> Gaddy staked lines 11/20/25
>
>
>
> We're at *day 77* from Gaddy's visit;t

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

image002.png (image/png, 127 KB)

image002.png

image003.png (image/png, 177 KB)

image003.png

image004.png (image/png, 144 KB)

image004.png

Download Original (.eml)