Skip to content

Wed 5 Feb 2025 12 07 57 0500 Re Violation Of Court Terms 60 Days Moving The Fence 194D7153 2

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence medium
Reason Email subject references court terms violation, likely attorney communication about compliance matter
Original File wed_5_feb_2025_12_07_57_-0500_re_violation_of_court_terms_-_60_days_moving_the_fence_194d7153_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
wed_5_feb_2025_12_07_57_-0500_re_violation_of_court_terms_-_60_days_moving_the_fence_194d7153_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: Violation of court terms - 60 days moving the fence
Date Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:07:57 -0500
Email Body
It is a signed plat by a surveyor, not a final plat. The word "*final"* is
misrepresented every time it is used., it is not a "final" plat. Conditions
outside the homes were not the final lot configuration when it was signed
on 10/11/24, and still not.

**Additionally, a 3rd violation, Sweatman,* informed everyone  on Monday
2/3 of his 30 inches of buried underground cement. *
Buried cement is artificial and changes the natural water flow to my yard,
as shown in the pooling of water in the attached picture.
*page 49 line 7, no artificial redirection of water *

 How is the court notified of this violation?
[image: artifical water.png]






*Also, in my other email, you explained clearly in court how cameras
recording me in my backyard, would be against the law. T**his is his 1st
violation,*
 How is the court notified of this violation?
*page 49 line 23*

[image: pg 49 Ledermeier camera.png]



On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:30 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> The court terms are not written to what you are stating.
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:07 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sarah,
>>
>>
>>
>> The final plat will not be received until it is approved by the City and
>> County; only then is it considered final as a certification approving it is
>> a requirement in order for it to be recorded as the new plat. This is not a
>> violation, but I understand the position. I can try to push that they move
>> the fence within sixty days of receipt of the revised, final plat as
>> discussed at Monday’s meeting. I know Gaddy said we would have it the next
>> day, but I have not received it yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
>> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>>
>>
>> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>>
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
>> Direct:  404.365.4564
>>
>> Main: 770.200.7000
>>
>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 5, 2025 7:45 AM
>> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
>> *Subject:* Violation of court terms - 60 days moving the fence
>>
>>
>>
>> Exact words from Page 41 of the court terms.
>>
>>
>>
>> * the fence will be relocated six -- within 60 days after the receipt of
>> the new survey. *
>>
>>
>>
>> A* new survey* was stamped and provided to the opposing party 10/21/24
>>
>> Gaddy staked lines 11/20/25
>>
>>
>>
>> We're at *day 77* from Gaddy's visit;the fence has not moved and does
>> not match the "final" survey document you provided.
>>
>>
>>
>> *He is not following the terms we all have in writing from court.*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Smokeball Reference V3:
>> fe80318a-fdfb-425f-9025-d790159d3013_5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8_0484eadf-fc72-4ff4-8784-1d04ee4cf0d2.
>>
>> *Disclaimer*
>>
>> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
>> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
>> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
>> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
>> be unlawful.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
>> automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber
>> resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection,
>> security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential
>> capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from
>> malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the
>> movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit
>> our website.
>>
>

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

image002.png (image/png, 144 KB)

image002.png

pg 49 Ledermeier camera.png (image/png, 177 KB)

pg 49 Ledermeier camera.png

artifical water.png (image/png, 127 KB)

artifical water.png

IMG_7289.heic (image/heif, 3 MB)

IMG_7289.heic

Download Original (.eml)