Thu 14 Apr 2022 18 12 00 0400 Re External Re Is There A Survey Date Confirmed Yet 1802A222 2¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney |
| Confidence | medium |
| Reason | Email subject references survey date confirmation; likely attorney coordination about expert scheduling |
| Original File | thu_14_apr_2022_18_12_00_-0400_re_external_re_is_there_a_survey_date_confirmed_yet_1802a222_2.eml |
| File Type | EML |
| Source | gmail-export |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> |
| To | Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> |
| CC | Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>, "Sally L. Monico" <SCook@mmatllaw.com> |
| Subject | Re: [External] Re: Is there a survey date confirmed yet? |
| Date | Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:12:00 -0400 |
Email Body
Thank you for explaining things to me.
things are happening with no explanation I removed Amy I had no idea she’s
a lawyer and I thought she is part of my attorney client privilege (how am
I supposed to know)
The point of the counter I thought shows that I can’t use that area and
here I am using that area. That to me muddies the waters to me, but I’m not
a lawyer
Or a court
I don’t know what’s going on or what the next steps are or aren’t, I’m in
the dark that is why I asked sally about the hvac service.
Should I send that communication to you all as well? I showed them a
picture etc if they felt it was ok to still try to come service the units.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 6:04 PM Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
> Sarah – its what needs to happen with the lawsuit pending. Its not an
> admission of anything and does not effect your counterclaims. It is a
> courtesy only and is to prevent them from calling the cops due to their
> claims. If we didn’t give them notice and they brought the fact that we
> knew that your HVAC guys were going to be likely stepping on property that
> was theirs (not the disputed property but their undisputed property due to
> the close proximity of the units even if the line is where you contend),
> the Court would come down on us. It is not an admission in any way. We
> don’t need the Court to have an impression of you doing things to expand
> the litigation. Now, if they cause any problems and we gave them the heads
> up, its them that are expanding things. While this is standard and
> understood and communications between counsel aren’t evidence, we are happy
> to go back and state that this notice is for courtesy purposes only if it
> eases any of your concerns.
>
>
>
> Also Sarah – please be aware that any emails that copy Amy and us on the
> same email are discoverable. It is why we try to send emails separately as
> much as possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Tania
>
>
>
> *Tania R. Tuttle *
> Partner, Real Estate Litigation
>
>
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
> |
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Ste 125
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
> |
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Main: 770-200-7000
>
> Direct: 404.365.4575
>
> ttuttle@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue
> of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee
> contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email,
> you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email
> transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information
> meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly
> prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email
> and notify the sender immediately.*
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2022 5:55 PM
> *To:* Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
> *Cc:* Amy Azza <Amy.Azza@stewart.com>; Brett Ledermeier <
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [External] Re: Is there a survey date confirmed yet?
>
>
>
> Im not a lawyer but I don’t think that was a good idea by emailing Lisa
> rose, that contradicted my counter suit,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:18 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can you send me the email you sent to my other attorneys? I’ll be charged
> for your emails etc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:39 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> I contacted Lisa and gave her the heads up.
>
>
>
> I copied Rich and Eric on the email so they are in the loop.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> Pardon any typos.
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2022, at 3:26 PM, Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Ok. Before I do, Sally - did you already contact rose law ? so I can be
> correct when speak to him?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:23 PM Amy Azza <Amy.Azza@stewart.com> wrote:
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/200+Fifth+Avenue,+Suite+301+%0D%0A+Waltham,%0D%0A+MA+%0D%0A+02451?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Sarah- please ask your personal attorney to advise on that. Thank you.
> Amy
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/200+Fifth+Avenue,+Suite+301+%0D%0A+Waltham,%0D%0A+MA+%0D%0A+02451?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
> *Am
Attachments¶
image003.jpg (image/jpeg, 1 MB)
image002.jpg (image/jpeg, 2 KB)
image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)
