* Also please put in writing and help me understand:
Why Johnathan Sweatman a layperson, is in charge of dictating what the
licensed GA surveyor hired by the insurance policy I paid for and ordered
by you, gets to dictate the outcome of the report, it’s recorded numbers -
that you ordered for your policy holder?
I do not trust anything that’s going on right now.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:29 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
> It’s 1030 Sunday night. I am waiting for Friday’s communication with the
> court reporter.
>
> Did that not occur? Did they tell you I also spoke with them?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:55 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. Let’s start with why are you not communicating during standard
>> business hours when you had weeks to do so?
>>
>> 2. Please forward me your email with the court from Friday as you claim.
>>
>> 3. It is 10pm on a Sunday night. This is inappropriate and unprofessional.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:47 PM Brett Ledermeier <
>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you not want me to tell the court that they can enter an order to
>>> expedite? Also, you are welcome to attend; it’s via Zoom.
>>>
>>> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
>>> 11625 Rainwater Drive
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> |
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Ste 125
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> |
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Alpharetta, Ga 30009
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Direct: 404.365.4564
>>>
>>> Main: 770.200.7000
>>>
>>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Image]
>>>
>>>
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication
>>> in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>>> sender immediately.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2025 8:59:38 PM
>>> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Why are there 2 hearings in two weeks?
>>>
>>> No. I will be attending and I do not want your unilateral suggestion
>>> tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>> —->>>Why did you not follow up with me on Friday and only the court?
>>>
>>> I do not trust a lot of what is going on here. I am not agreeing with
>>> your “Sunday night” shoving down my throat game plan- Emailing me 13 hours
>>> before court on a Sunday telling me to come to my own court hearing and
>>> dictating what I’m doing with no discussion.
>>>
>>> This is being mishandled on all sides.
>>>
>>> Miramar purposely told me the wrong court date and has ignored all my
>>> emails since.
>>>
>>> ->Sweatman does not get to dictate how a surveyor performs his job.
>>>
>>> I will be reporting the surveyor’s actions, emails, the on site
>>> recordings, and recorded phone calls.
>>>
>>> This situation is unethical and Sweatman’s council is not giving the
>>> transcript because they do not have them and they both of y’all did not
>>> have the transcript at the site visit.
>>>
>>> I recorded the site visit and will be able to confirm his council's
>>> unethical actions once I get the transcript
>>>
>>> It’s apparent, miramar failed to order the transcript in an adequate
>>> time frame after court …7 months later?? and Miramar from her emails
>>> continues to propose that I be represented in a blind fashion with a court
>>> order?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> I am not signing anything blind as Miramar is pushing for me to do so
>>> and will also be reporting her to the Florida Bar.
>>>
>>> DeKalb county cannot do a court order over Brookhaven’s zoning. There
>>> have been changes to Brookhaven’s codes and and this will be going back to
>>> Brookhaven as 3 properties are be effected by this.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 7:41 PM Brett Ledermeier <
>>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sarah,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope all is well. I just wanted to let you know that we followed up
>>> with the Court reporter again on Friday regarding the transcript we h