It’s 1030 Sunday night. I am waiting for Friday’s communication with the
court reporter.
Did that not occur? Did they tell you I also spoke with them?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:55 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Let’s start with why are you not communicating during standard business
> hours when you had weeks to do so?
>
> 2. Please forward me your email with the court from Friday as you claim.
>
> 3. It is 10pm on a Sunday night. This is inappropriate and unprofessional.
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:47 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Why do you not want me to tell the court that they can enter an order to
>> expedite? Also, you are welcome to attend; it’s via Zoom.
>>
>> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> |
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Ste 125
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> |
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Alpharetta, Ga 30009
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Direct: 404.365.4564
>>
>> Main: 770.200.7000
>>
>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Image]
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2025 8:59:38 PM
>> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: Why are there 2 hearings in two weeks?
>>
>> No. I will be attending and I do not want your unilateral suggestion
>> tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> —->>>Why did you not follow up with me on Friday and only the court?
>>
>> I do not trust a lot of what is going on here. I am not agreeing with
>> your “Sunday night” shoving down my throat game plan- Emailing me 13 hours
>> before court on a Sunday telling me to come to my own court hearing and
>> dictating what I’m doing with no discussion.
>>
>> This is being mishandled on all sides.
>>
>> Miramar purposely told me the wrong court date and has ignored all my
>> emails since.
>>
>> ->Sweatman does not get to dictate how a surveyor performs his job.
>>
>> I will be reporting the surveyor’s actions, emails, the on site
>> recordings, and recorded phone calls.
>>
>> This situation is unethical and Sweatman’s council is not giving the
>> transcript because they do not have them and they both of y’all did not
>> have the transcript at the site visit.
>>
>> I recorded the site visit and will be able to confirm his council's
>> unethical actions once I get the transcript
>>
>> It’s apparent, miramar failed to order the transcript in an adequate
>> time frame after court …7 months later?? and Miramar from her emails
>> continues to propose that I be represented in a blind fashion with a court
>> order?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> I am not signing anything blind as Miramar is pushing for me to do so
>> and will also be reporting her to the Florida Bar.
>>
>> DeKalb county cannot do a court order over Brookhaven’s zoning. There
>> have been changes to Brookhaven’s codes and and this will be going back to
>> Brookhaven as 3 properties are be effected by this.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 7:41 PM Brett Ledermeier <
>> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sarah,
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope all is well. I just wanted to let you know that we followed up
>> with the Court reporter again on Friday regarding the transcript we haven’t
>> received. Tomorrow’s hearing is via Zoom and you do not need to attend;
>> it’s merely a status conference. That being said, opposing counsel’s
>> refusal to give us the transcript and, more importantly, refusal to tell us
>> if they are trying to proceed with a variance appeal over a Court Order for
>> the impervious surface issue will absolutely be brought to the Judge’s
>> attention; I am sick of their games and delays and this hearing marks the
>> perfect opportunity to ensure that there aren’t any more games moving
>> forward. I will also m