Sat 8 Jan 2022 22 44 45 0000 Re Question 17E3Bddb 2
| Field | Value |
| Category | Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | [sonnet] Email from Swift Currie opposing counsel to Zeeman |
| Original File | sat_8_jan_2022_22_44_45_0000_re_question_17e3bddb_2.eml |
| File Type | EML |
| Source | gmail-export |
sat_8_jan_2022_22_44_45_0000_re_question_17e3bddb_2.eml
Email
| Header | Value |
| From | Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> |
| To | Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> |
| Subject | RE: Question |
| Date | Sat, 08 Jan 2022 22:44:45 +0000 |
Email Body
Hi Sarah,
Georgia is a “one party consent” state, so as long as one of the parties to a conversation has consented to the recording, it is not illegal to record the conversation. Typically, if you were a party to the conversation, you can be the “one party” who consented. If you were not involved in the conversation, however, you would need to show that one of the parties to the conversation consented to being recorded. This applies to audio only – video recordings have different standards.
That being said, whether a recording is admissible in court depends on a number of other factors, in addition to whether the recording was obtained legally. Admissibility in court is subject to the rules of evidence and the rules of civil procedure and I would not be able to say for certain whether the recording would be admissible without knowing the contents of the recording. For evidence to be admissible, it must be, first and foremost, relevant to the issues before the court. Admissibility is a question of law for the presiding judge to decide.
[cid:image001.png@01D804B6.DE353EA0]
Lucy Aquino<http://Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com/>
404.888.6202<tel:404.888.6202>
NOTICE: This email message and all attachments may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized transmittal. Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality, including all privileges that may apply. Pursuant to those rights and privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies of the message and the attachments immediately. NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION. If you do not have a signed fee contract or engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your attorney.
From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 8, 2022 4:10 PM
To: Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
Subject: Question
Hi Lucy,
Situation:
IF there was an audio recording of the COB code/engineering officers stating the neighbor was approved for one site design and built something else. Which they then “busted” him on but then they still allowed him to continue to building with the knowledge there was not adequate drainage, permits etc
Question:
In Ga is this type of recording something that could be used in court?
Didn’t know how GA laws view recordings etc
Thanks!
Attachments
image001.png (image/png, 1 KB)

Download Original (.eml)