Skip to content

Re Sweatman V. Zeeman Zeeman Discovery Responses Statutory Electronic Serviceeric B. Coleman Ecolemanwczlaw.Com

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence high
Reason Email between WCZ Law attorney and opposing counsel regarding discovery responses service
Original File re-sweatman-v.-zeeman-zeeman-discovery-responses-statutory-electronic-serviceeric-b.-coleman-ecolemanwczlaw.com.msg
File Type MSG
Source hdd-1
re-sweatman-v.-zeeman-zeeman-discovery-responses-statutory-electronic-serviceeric-b.-coleman-ecolemanwczlaw.com.msg

Email

Header Value
From rcapriola@wczlaw.com
To Tania Tuttle; david.atkinson@swiftcurrie.com
Subject RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic ServiceEric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>
Date Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic ServiceEric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>
Email Body
I will respond to Rose









 <http://www.wczlaw.net/>      



________________________________

Rich Capriola





Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC

One Ameris Center
3490 Piedmont Road NE, Suite 800
Atlanta, GA 30305
www.wczlaw.com <http://www.wczlaw.com/> 

rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.com> 

View Bio <https://wczlaw.com/attorneys/chadd-l-reynolds/> 

tel

dir tel

404.844.5700

404.844.5637

















This communication (together with all attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information and its sender reserves and asserts all rights that may apply to it. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error and delete the copy you received. Thank you.

Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.





From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> 
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 4:04 PM
To: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>; david.atkinson@swiftcurrie.com
Cc: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>; Joseph G. Emanuel <joseph.emanuel@swiftcurrie.com>
Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic ServiceEric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>





    CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 



Counsel,

Please see the attached correspondence.

-Lisa







Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC


Mailing:   4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
O: 678.806.8188 <tel:770.231.9783>   E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer  <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>  W: www.roselitigation.lawyer <http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/> 








CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 


This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.



From: Lisa Rose 
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 9:38 AM
To: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >; Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com <mailto:Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.com> >; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com <mailto:ecoleman@wczlaw.com> >
Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service



Counsel:



Good morning. Last week I sent a request for permission for my client and his contractor to gain temporary access to your clients property in an effort to preserve and protect the fence. In addition to the preservation of the fence, painting and staining the fence will enhance the aesthetics of the fence for your client.  In addition, I requested an update on the documents that were to be provided shortly after 4.1.22.



I have not heard back from anyone in response to both requests, other than Tanias email below.  Please provide an update on both items.



I am available to discuss the parameters around the request to paint/stain the fence, so as to maintain the peace between our clients.  I appreciate someone reaching out to me this week.



Thank you,



Lisa 







Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC


Mailing:   4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Attachments

image003.jpg (image/jpeg, 2 KB)

image003.jpg

image004.png (image/png, 3 KB)

image004.png

image005.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image005.jpg

Download Original (.msg)