Re Sweatman V. Zeeman Zeeman Discovery Responses Statutory Electronic Service 4¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney |
| Confidence | high |
| Reason | Email chain between multiple attorneys discussing discovery responses and fence issue coordination |
| Original File | re-sweatman-v.-zeeman-zeeman-discovery-responses-statutory-electronic-service-4.msg |
| File Type | MSG |
| Source | hdd-1 |
Email¶
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| From | ecoleman@wczlaw.com |
| To | Tania Tuttle; Richard J. Capriola |
| Subject | RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service |
| Date | Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service |
Email Body
Yes, we do need to get that call regarding documents rescheduled. What works next week for you on that?
I will follow up with our client on the fence issue.
Eric B. Coleman <http://www.wczlaw.net/attorneys/eric-coleman/>
Attorney at Law
Partner
direct: 404.844.5663
mobile: 678.975.0703
ecoleman@wczlaw.com <mailto:ecoleman@wczlaw.net>
From: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 9:41 AM
To: Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>
Cc: Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>; Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Rich/Eric Ill let you guys run with the fence issue. Eric do you want to set up a call to discuss discovery production. Copying my associate Brett on this as he will likely be the one to jump on the call.
Thanks, Tania
Tania R. Tuttle
Partner, Real Estate Litigation
11625 Rainwater Drive. | Ste 125 | Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct: 404.365.4575
Cell: 404.661.3453
ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.
From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> >
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 9:01 AM
To: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> >
Cc: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com <mailto:Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.com> >; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com <mailto:ecoleman@wczlaw.com> >
Subject: RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory Electronic Service
Sally,
Good morning. When do you anticipate producing the responsive documents as indicated in your email dated 4.1.22?
Secondly, my client would like to paint/seal the fence to maintain its integrity. He requests permission from your client for his insured third party vendor to be able to stand on your clients yard, to paint the fence.
There is an obvious benefit to your client if the fence is painted as it will be more aesthetically pleasing and will better preserve the fence over time. Please call me to discuss this temporary request for access to her property by the vendor to paint the fence.
Thank you,
Lisa
Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC
Mailing: 4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068
Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
O: 678.806.8188 <tel:770.231.9783> E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> W: www.roselitigation.lawyer <http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.
From: Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com <mailto:SCook@mmatllaw.com> >
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 6:14 PM
To: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> >
Cc: Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com <mailto:Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com> >; Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com <mailto:rcapriola@wczlaw.co
Attachments¶
image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)
image002.png (image/png, 3 KB)