Skip to content

Re 21Cv9795 7 Sweatman V Zeeman 32

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-to-Attorney
Confidence high
Reason Attorney Lisa Rose scheduling call with Brett Ledermeier to discuss survey issues
Original File re-21cv9795-7-sweatman-v-zeeman-32.msg
File Type MSG
Source hdd-1
re-21cv9795-7-sweatman-v-zeeman-32.msg

Email

Header Value
From lisa@roselitigation.lawyer
To Brett Ledermeier
Subject RE: 21CV9795-7 Sweatman v Zeeman
Date 21CV9795-7 Sweatman v Zeeman
Email Body
Brett, are you available at 1 or 2 pm for a short call to discuss one issue with the survey?



-Lisa









Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC


Mailing:   4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
O: 678.806.8188 <tel:770.231.9783>   E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer  <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>  W: www.roselitigation.lawyer <http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 


This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.







From: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> 
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2025 12:09 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>; Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: Re: 21CV9795-7 Sweatman v Zeeman



Brett,



My client has a few concerns/issues with the revised survey. I have a meeting with him tomorrow and I will send you an email thereafter outlining the concerns to be addressed by the surveyor.



Once I learn of his concerns, I will respond to your email as to whether the additional stakes are necessary.



-Lisa











Lisa Rose
Rose Litigation, LLC


Mailing:   4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165-522 Marietta, GA 30068

Physical: 533 Johnson Ferry Road, Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
O: 678.806.8188 <tel:770.231.9783>   E: lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>  W: www.roselitigation.lawyer <http://www.roselitigation.lawyer/> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 


This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email, including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying, forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact on your case.









________________________________

From: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> >
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 11:17 AM
To: Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer <mailto:lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> >
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com <mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com> >; Timothy L. Mitchell <tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com <mailto:tmitchell@cmlawfirm.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >
Subject: RE: 21CV9795-7 Sweatman v Zeeman 



Lisa, 



The surveyor misspoke and is actually available Tuesday. That being said, the surveyor said that a string could merely be drawn from each pin that was set at the meeting and does not see any need to stake the property. The Court order said that it must be staked if necessary and both my client and the surveyor do not believe it is necessary. Given the Judges position at the hearing, I do not believe either party want to get the Judge involved. Alternatively, if your client just wants it staked for moving the fence, he is within his right to have that done at that time. 



Wed also request that the strings your client has had up for an extended period of time be removed. Please confirm that he will remove the same and provide a time frame. 



Thank you. 



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in ab

Attachments

image002.png (image/png, 3 KB)

image002.png

image004.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image004.jpg

image005.jpg (image/jpeg, 5 KB)

image005.jpg

Download Original (.msg)