Mon 10 Jan 2022 17 14 56 0500 Re Question 17E460F0 2¶

Yes I signed on Friday.

Please go forward with communication with Richard.  I gave him your info.


I am figuring out to the best method to request a new lawyer instead of
Sally with stewart title or that firm etc... so please do not include her
at this time.

Thank you.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:12 PM Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, Sarah. Have you formally retained Richard? If so, I will forward a
> draft of our answer so he can start on the counter-claims.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lucy Aquino* <http://Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com/>
>
> 404.888.6202
>
> NOTICE:  This email message and all attachments may contain legally
> privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee.
> If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its
> attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized
> transmittal.  Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality,
> including all privileges that may apply.  Pursuant to those rights and
> privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute
> or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this
> message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies
> of the message and the attachments immediately.  NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR
> CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION.  If you do not have a signed fee contract or
> engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your
> attorney.​
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 3:57 PM
> *To:* Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Question
>
>
>
> Very glad I have a recording of Friday,
>
> I sent a thank you email for the meeting and the city guys have amnesia of
> everything we discussed.
>
>
>
> The Dekalb county sewer easement violation is the main thing I'm trying to
> pursue now.
>
> I sent them a FOIA and now figuring out how to submit a code violation
> ticket to Dekalb
>
>
>
> My new lawyer for the counter is Richard Capriola
>
> He is getting up to speed.
>
>
>
> Please do not inform Rose law or Sally at this time.
>
> Sally is not acting in my best interests.
>
>
>
>
>
> Contact:
>
> Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC
>
> www.wczlaw.com
>
> https://wczlaw.com/attorneys/richard-j-capriola/
>
> rcapriola@wczlaw.com
>
>
>
> 404.844.5700
>
> 404.844.5637
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 11:50 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please keep the knowledge of a recording completely confidential at this
> time.
>
>
>
> I do not feel Sally Monico and the Title insurance is acting in my best
> interest,  *please do not share this information *with them at this time.
>
> I'll transcribe it using word dictation when I have an hr+ to set that up
> and specify the voices in the recording. Unless you have the time available
> to listen to it.
>
>
>
> The COB came to my property per my request to view the damage on Friday.
>
> Key items include COB stating:
>
>
>
>   “They didn’t build that extensions per the original plans” -he then said
> “let's state it in common terms - he got approved to build a deck and he
> got busted doing something beyond what he was allowed to do. That's all
> there is to it. He went beyond the scope of his permit...
>
>
>
>  “Nothing wrong with a French drain, he did not submit calculations of the
> volume on how it would be processed. I suggested for him to move it further
> from the property line, with notes you can not put a drain system on a
> sanitary sewer pipe. Originally when they went through the approved plans
> through Dekalb it went beyond the plan when Dekalb approved it. He
> resubmitted this change and Dekalb was unaware of that. I reached out to
> Dekalb, here are the changes, and it's currently under review ....the
> question is with the actual sewer pipe itself is 18 inches vertical 8 feet
> horizontal - it's up to DeKalb's desecration if they will allow that
> encroachment of the easement.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:54 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Thank you. So if I were to have had  an in person recording  of a 45 min
> conversation with 2 others but I am the one consenting…. a judge just has
> to confirm if it is admissible in court … <GRIN>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:44 PM Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Sarah,
>
>
>
> Georgia is a “one party consent” state, so as long as one of the parties
> to a conversation has consented to the recording, it is not illegal to
> record the conversation. Typically, if you were a party to the
> conversation, you can be the “one party” who consented.  If you were not
> involved in the conversation, however, you would need to show that one of
> the parties to the conversation consented to being recorded. This applies
> to audio only – video recordings have different standards.
>
>
>
> That being said, whether a recording is admiss