Thu 19 Jun 2025 23 38 23 0000 Re Fw Sweatman V. Zeeman 21Cv9795 1978A8Ef 2¶

As a follow-up, if we can get a final settlement agreement in line with transcript, incorporating the plat, that is simplified and in line with the settlement read into the transcript and they refuse to sign it, that puts us in the position to file a motion to enforce. I am on the phone with Jeff right now and we can get this done and finalized, removing various portions as noted, and switch the table. This will require us all setting up some time to discuss, revise, and finalize the agreement. Is there a time tomorrow that we can do this? If so, and it’s truly in line with the transcript and you execute and they refuse, that will set us up in a stronger position should we need to go back before the Judge.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[cid:image001.jpg@01DBE150.45759A50]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Brett Ledermeier
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:57 PM
To: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: RE: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795

Sarah,

I am more than happy to push for him to move the fence ASAP; well in advance of the City/County approval of the plat. That being said, the only chance I have at making the demand come to fruition is if we have a finalized settlement agreement ready for execution. Is this something that you can assist me with? It would be the only alternative legal argument to make in order to mandate that the fence be moved prior to final approval of the plat. Thinking long-term, their response will be that a re-platting was demanded, and a plat is not a survey, which is why they have not moved the fence. It’s a hyper technical distinction and not worth the time and expense to fight over, so a finalized settlement agreement is the best bet we have to get the fence moved.

Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081
11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564
Main: 770.200.7000
bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[cid:image001.jpg@01DBE150.45759A50]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com<mailto:szeeman@gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:47 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com<mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com<mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>>
Subject: Re: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman, 21cv9795

He needs to Move the fence

You are not following the exact words of the transcript and you keep lying to me … ie the cantilever was a flat out lie that I just learned about. - help me understand how that is fiduciary??



On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>> wrote:
For clarity, the Court Order uses “settlement agreement” as a non-capitalized, non-defined term; it is used in the general sense to indicate that the Judge is aware the parties have reached a resolution as it was read into the transcript at court. It is not referring to any specific settlement agreement and the settlement agreement draft was never sent to the Court. What we are doing with the settlement agreement draft is to memorialize the agreement all parties reached. We needed the Court Order in order to