Skip to content

Thu 12 Mar 2026 16 06 47 0400 Utf 8 Q Re 3A Client File Request E2 80 93 Sweatman V 2E Zee 19Ce3A8A 2

Field Value
Category Correspondence > Attorney-Client
Confidence high
Reason [sonnet] Zeeman requesting client file from Ledermeier/MMATLLAW
Original File thu_12_mar_2026_16_06_47_-0400_utf-8_q_re_3a_client_file_request_e2_80_93_sweatman_v_2e_zee_19ce3a8a_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
thu_12_mar_2026_16_06_47_-0400_utf-8_q_re_3a_client_file_request_e2_80_93_sweatman_v_2e_zee_19ce3a8a_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
CC Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>, Celeste Watwood <cwatwood@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: Client File Request – Sweatman v. Zeeman
Date Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:06:47 -0400
Email Body
Brett,

Thank you for the update. Please let me know when the device is available.
I look forward to reviewing my complete client file once the production is
finished.

Best,
Sarah

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:52 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
>
>
> Due to security concerns, we are limited in which, if any, devices can be
> connected to our computers to extract files. This is a security measure in
> place given the privileged information we hold for you and all other
> clients. That being said, we are working on extracting the information with
> our own, approved, device. As you know, there are quite a lot of files, and
> it will take a bit of time to get this organized. We will try to have this
> done by early next week.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2026 10:32 AM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Cc:* Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>; Celeste Watwood <
> cwatwood@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Client File Request – Sweatman v. Zeeman
>
>
>
> Brett,
>
> I wanted to follow up regarding the external hard drive that was delivered
> to your office yesterday morning.
>
> Please let me know when it will be ready for pickup with my client file
> materials.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 2:14 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Brett,
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
> As noted previously, I received access to the client portal on March 6,
> 2026 following my January 28, 2026 request for a complete copy of my client
> file.
>
> As you mentioned, the option to export documents to a drive, I will gladly
> send an external hard drive to your office, attention to you, so the files
> can be copied directly to help expedite the review process. I will send the
> Amazon shipping confirmation today for the drive in a separate email and
> will coordinate retrieval as soon as possible.
>
> Once I receive and review the full file on the drive, I will also confirm
> whether the file appears complete.
>
> I understand the proposed order and the City of Brookhaven redlines remain
> pending. I will address those materials after I have completed my review of
> the complete client file.
>
> At this stage, I am not yet in a position to provide a timeline for
> completing my review.
>
> Best,
> Sarah
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 11:21 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> The only way to send the entirety of the file, which I did, is via the
> practice management system. Otherwise, each document would need to be
> exported, downloaded, and added to an additional drive.
>
>
>
> I am still waiting on your review of the proposed order with the redlines
> from the City of Brookhaven. It has been nearly two years since the
> settlement, which was read into the record, and the proposed order is to
> get the plat approved by the City/County. I need this done otherwise we
> risk a motion to compel being filed against us. Please provide me with a
> turnaround time for your review; you’ve had it for quite some time now and
> the other parties need an update. Again, this case was settled in May 2024,
> favorably and with your approval. Pushing the agreement out this long isn’t
> proper and it puts us in a bad position with the Judge. If we can get the
> order approving the plat/settlement (which is already enforceable as it was
> read into the record), which was the recommendation of Gaddy last year, we
> could be the ones to file a motion to enforce and seek sanctions; this is a
> far better legal strategy than having one filed against us.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you’d like to set up a call to discuss. I am unable
> to advocate for you without cooperation and I remain hopeful that this can
> be wrapped up in its entirety soon.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smy

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

Download Original (.eml)