Sat 1 Feb 2025 17 11 19 0000 Re No To 4 Ft Stakes 194C27F2 2¶

The plat is prepared by Gaddy based on the legal requirements for a plat. He can provide an overview and the authorities on plat preparation.


Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[Image]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.

________________________________
From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 12:02:52 PM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
Subject: Re: No to 4 ft stakes.

Mandatory per what and can you show me?
It is redundant; the drainage clause already covers this.

Where did it come from?


On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 11:51 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>> wrote:

If they need to reissue one, they can do that. Most times, the check is still fine. Also, is the indemnification paragraph the only comment on the plat? I thought you had additional concerns? The indemnification paragraph is mandatory; Gaddy can discuss it in further detail. I am still waiting on his confirmation for 4PM on Monday and will send an update as soon as I hear from him. If you have other comments on the plat, I need them to send to opposing counsel.



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation

Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
Direct:  404.365.4564

Main: 770.200.7000

bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>


[cid:ii_194c2709e9e4ce8e91]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately.



From: Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com<mailto:szeeman@gmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 11:03 AM
To: Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>>
Cc: Jeff Banks <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com<mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com>>; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com<mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>>
Subject: Re: No to 4 ft stakes.



Brett,



The attached check is now void,...  link: https://prnt.sc/n6oEjRaNiya8

Please advise.



On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:49 PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com<mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>> wrote:

Sarah,



I cannot discuss coverage regarding the depositions; that is a question that must be directed to Marimar. As for the settlement, we received the check from opposing counsel and are holding it. This check is not in an interest-bearing account and we can’t release it until the settlement agreement is executed.



With regard to the meeting with Gaddy, we only have until Monday, per the Judge’s Order, to meet with him and finalize the survey. This must be a top priority. The Judge indicated that counsel must meet with him, but I presumed you would also like to be present at the meeting which is why I asked for dates/times that work for you.



On that note, we have discussed the survey over several phone calls, and you indicated that you would send a highlighted/noted copy of the survey with any questions/concerns you may have. Can you please provide it at your earliest convenience. Further, as explained on our calls, the indemnification language is standard and required on all new plats. I know you have raised this as a concern, and objected to the same, but it is a legal requirement; Gaddy can further discuss this matter in our meeting.



Please feel free to let me know if you have any additional questions/concerns or if you’d like to set up a call.



Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier
Sen