Re Fw Sweatman V. Zeeman Judges Order Approving Settlement And Plat Reconfiguration City Of Brookhaven 17¶

Hi Brett,

For clarity and to correct a scriveners error in my prior email, the reference to Fulton County Court should read DeKalb County Superior Court.

All other statements in my prior email remain accurate and unchanged.

Best regards,

Sarah Zeeman



On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 9:32AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> > wrote:


    Hi Brett,

    For clarity and to avoid any misunderstanding, no executed settlement agreement exists. I do not authorize the submission of any filings, motions, proposed orders, amendments, surveys, plats, or other communications to the Court, or any representations to the Court or third parties that anything is being submitted on my behalf or is under my review, without my prior written approval.

    For the record, I did not approve or authorize the prior closing of my court case (21CV9795) on or around March 17, 2025, the submission of any order, or the submission of any survey or plat to Fulton County Court or to the City of Brookhaven.

    As noted in my emails dated December 1, 2025 and December 18, 2025, I am still awaiting the requested documentation, including communications with opposing counsel, the City, the surveyor, and the expediter, as well as any responses to the settlement edits I transmitted in June 2025. I need those materials before I can meaningfully review or consider any proposed order or next steps.

    Accordingly, I do not approve the proposed order at this time.

    Best regards,
    Sarah Zeeman


    On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 5:18PM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> > wrote:


        I apologize as I forgot to attach the proposed order with the redlines from the City Attorney and opposing counsel. 



        Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier 
        Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation


        Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081

        11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
        Direct:  404.365.4564

        Main: 770.200.7000

        bledermeier@mmatllaw.com <mailto:bledermeier@mmatllaw.com> 






        CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
        No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately. 



        From: Brett Ledermeier 
        Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 10:21 AM
        To: 'Sarah Zeeman' <szeeman@gmail.com <mailto:szeeman@gmail.com> >
        Cc: 'Jeff Banks' <jeffsbanks@hotmail.com <mailto:jeffsbanks@hotmail.com> >; Celeste Watwood <cwatwood@mmatllaw.com <mailto:cwatwood@mmatllaw.com> >; Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com <mailto:ttuttle@mmatllaw.com> >
        Subject: RE: FW: Sweatman v. Zeeman - Judge's Order Approving Settlement and Plat Reconfiguration/City of Brookhaven



        Sarah, 



        Opposing counsel just sent over a few redlines on the proposed amended order approving the settlement and plat reconfiguration. Please confirm receipt, review, and let me know if you approve the edits. This is just an amendment of the prior order the Judge demanded last February and it is what Gaddy, whom you requested, suggested to push through the plat reconfiguration. It has now been more than 6 months and we are risking a motion to enforce/contempt which I want to avoid. 



        As previously stated, once we send the attached to the Court and the expediter brings it to the City for approval, we can file a motion to enforce and seek sanctions/fees. If we dont move this forward, you are put in a very risky position as the Judge made herself abundantly clear last year at the hearing that we need to do everything possible to finalize this. 



        The expediter has been on hold for months. As for the City Attorney, we have communicate via phone and simply waited on the amendments from him. I also understand that you have been in communication with him claiming that the FOIA/open records they provided were not in compliance. Id ask that you refrain from making such allegations to the City Attorney as, again, it could hinder the resolution. 



        Can we please schedule a call on this so that we can discuss and get back on the same page. As you know, I have advocated for you every step on the way. At the same time, we need to comply with the law and the Courts clear direction. 



        This should be a top priority. 



        If I do not hear back from you on the proposed order by next Friday, I will still need to send it to the J