Mon 23 Aug 2021 17 40 56 0400 Re Email From Seepanov 17B74F59 2¶

Hi Clif and Rick,


Thank you for the update.


Here are a  few thoughts:


It may be more cost-effective to proceed with a new full complete survey
for my entire property including the areas that you specified plus the area
that is not currently enclosed in the fenceline where the ATT easment used
to reside.


My thinking, the  entire fence is 27 years old and needs replacement. I'll
use the new full survey for approval by City of Brookhaven to construct a
fence to back up to his future fence on the shared fence-line for a uniform
matching fence throughout the circumference on my property.


Sweatman has solely planned for his choice of fence style to match his
fence circumference and I prefer to not to continue his design throughout
my whole property.


If this is an option, next step would be updating pricing and I'm curious
if this should be performed by the same surveyor or a different one you
feel would be most suitible for this situation?


Additionally if you advise to use with this same surveyor, he mentioned
using the silk fence placements as a gauge.  The silk was put up solely by
Sweatman and is already more than 3 feet onto my property and to me is
questionable.


I am a novice, and am probably misunderstanding the vernacular but it is
hard for confidence in a collaspable tarp representing the previous fence
structure when its been already migrated 3+feet?


**On a separate question/situation  - I have endured Sweatman's storm water
flooding into my yard the entire time I have lived at my home. His storm
water runoff flows directly into my back yard causing ~30% of my yard  to
flood with standing water every time it rains.

I have pictures and videos of the water flow/floods, erosion damage and
including the cracked side driveway from erosion. Just in case  there is
anything that can be done to address this?


I bring  this up because during his recent  leveling of his back yard he
removed large buried underground cement blocks (I had no idea were
previously there) being  used to prop up his yard that he had covered with
rocks and grass that ultimately would not grow or drain water due to the
underground impervious surface.


Additionally he just added new a black underground pipeline  that takes the
water runoff from his roofing and moves it away from his home/backyard and
pivots it to exit directly pointing into my backyard.


Best,

Sarah





On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:59 PM Clifton Kitchens <cak@alembik.com> wrote:

> Hey, Sarah.  I am attaching an email we got from Eugene Stepanov today.
>
> Also, Rick would like to know if you agree with the items that Rick laid
> out in the email from 8/13 which I have also attached. Or is there anything
> you think he missed?
>
>
>
>
>
> Clifton Kitchens
>
> Office Administrator
>
> Richard S. Alembik, PC
>
> 315 W. Ponce de Leon Avenue
>
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY*: This e-mail may contain confidential information
> intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or
> disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
> transmission in error, please notify Richard S. Alembik, PC at the
> telephone number and e-mail address provided.
>
>
>
> Suite 250
> Decatur, GA 30030-5100 (USA)
>
> ' (1) (404) 373-0205 ext. 3
> 7  (1) (404) 795-8999
> š  *cak*@alembik.com <j@alembik.com>
> þ  www.alembik.com
>
>
>
> *NO CLIENT RELATIONSHIP*: Communication with an attorney or staff member
> at Richard S. Alembik, PC does not by itself create an attorney-client
> relationship or constitute the provision or receipt of legal advice. Any
> communication from an attorney or staff member should be considered
> informational only, and should not be relied or acted upon until a formal
> attorney-client relationship is established via a written agreement.
>
>
>
> *TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE*: Unless expressly stated
> otherwise, any information, opinion or advice included in this
> communication (including any attachments) is not intended to constitute a
> complete analysis of all tax considerations, and is not intended to be used
> (and cannot be used) for (i) the purpose of avoiding any tax-related
> penalty that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) to
> support the promotion or marketing of, or to recommend to another party any
> transaction or matter related to federal taxation. Each taxpayer should
> seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an
> independent tax advisor.
>
>
>
>
>