Mon 10 Jan 2022 15 56 48 0500 Re Question 17E45C77 2¶

Very glad I have a recording of Friday,
I sent a thank you email for the meeting and the city guys have amnesia of
everything we discussed.

The Dekalb county sewer easement violation is the main thing I'm trying to
pursue now.
I sent them a FOIA and now figuring out how to submit a code violation
ticket to Dekalb


My new lawyer for the counter is Richard Capriola
He is getting up to speed.

Please do not inform Rose law or Sally at this time.
Sally is not acting in my best interests.


Contact:
Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC

www.wczlaw.com

https://wczlaw.com/attorneys/richard-j-capriola/

rcapriola@wczlaw.com

404.844.5700

404.844.5637















On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 11:50 AM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please keep the knowledge of a recording completely confidential at this
> time.
>
> I do not feel Sally Monico and the Title insurance is acting in my best
> interest,  *please do not share this information *with them at this time.
> I'll transcribe it using word dictation when I have an hr+ to set that up
> and specify the voices in the recording. Unless you have the time available
> to listen to it.
>
> The COB came to my property per my request to view the damage on Friday.
> Key items include COB stating:
>
>   “They didn’t build that extensions per the original plans” -he then
> said “let's state it in common terms - he got approved to build a deck and
> he got busted doing something beyond what he was allowed to do. That's
> all there is to it. He went beyond the scope of his permit...
>
>  “Nothing wrong with a French drain, he did not submit calculations of
> the volume on how it would be processed. I suggested for him to move it
> further from the property line, with notes you can not put a drain system
> on a sanitary sewer pipe. Originally when they went through the approved
> plans through Dekalb it went beyond the plan when Dekalb approved it. He
> resubmitted this change and Dekalb was unaware of that. I reached out to
> Dekalb, here are the changes, and it's currently under review ....the
> question is with the actual sewer pipe itself is 18 inches vertical 8 feet
> horizontal - it's up to DeKalb's desecration if they will allow that
> encroachment of the easement.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:54 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you. So if I were to have had  an in person recording  of a 45 min
>> conversation with 2 others but I am the one consenting…. a judge just has
>> to confirm if it is admissible in court … <GRIN>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 5:44 PM Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sarah,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Georgia is a “one party consent” state, so as long as one of the parties
>>> to a conversation has consented to the recording, it is not illegal to
>>> record the conversation. Typically, if you were a party to the
>>> conversation, you can be the “one party” who consented.  If you were not
>>> involved in the conversation, however, you would need to show that one of
>>> the parties to the conversation consented to being recorded. This applies
>>> to audio only – video recordings have different standards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That being said, whether a recording is admissible in court depends on a
>>> number of other factors, in addition to whether the recording was obtained
>>> legally. Admissibility in court is subject to the rules of evidence and the
>>> rules of civil procedure and I would not be able to say for certain whether
>>> the recording would be admissible without knowing the contents of the
>>> recording. For evidence to be admissible, it must be, first and foremost,
>>> relevant to the issues before the court. Admissibility is a question of law
>>> for the presiding judge to decide.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Lucy Aquino* <http://Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com/>
>>>
>>> 404.888.6202
>>>
>>> NOTICE:  This email message and all attachments may contain legally
>>> privileged and confidential information intended solely for the addressee.
>>> If you are not an intended recipient, your receipt of this email and its
>>> attachments is the result of an inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized
>>> transmittal.  Sender reserves and asserts all rights to confidentiality,
>>> including all privileges that may apply.  Pursuant to those rights and
>>> privileges, you are hereby notified that you may not read, copy, distribute
>>> or otherwise use this message or its attachments. If you have received this
>>> message in error, please notify the sender by email and delete all copies
>>> of the message and the attachments immediately.  NO DUTIES ARE INTENDED OR
>>> CREATED BY THIS COMMUNICATION.  If you do not have a signed fee contract or
>>> engagement letter with this firm, this firm does NOT represent you as your
>>> attorney.​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 8, 2022 4:10 PM
>>> *To:* Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>
>>> *Subject:* Question
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>