Fri 1 Apr 2022 15 23 27 0400 Re Blue Surveyor Signature Disclaimer 17Fe6952 2¶

ok - I'm good with having that removed -

I don't know her ( Jennifer Flores) , I saw within the FOIA  I received,
she was Forwarded 2 of my emails about my situation -   within the FWD
the COB employee states had been telling her about the Sweatman etc

- should she still be included?

 1.     Jennifer Flores

a.     Address: 734 Steffi CT Lawrenceville, GA 30044

b.     Statement of what they know: Emails received from FOIA #
PRR-713-2021 shows COB employee and Code enforcement officer, Orlando
Flores has been telling her about Jonathan Sweatman and the situation per
his emails to her from his COB email account.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 1:43 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com> wrote:

> I would lean towards omitting the below and waiting for the surveyor to
> discuss.
>
>
>
> Depending on the results of the survey we will have to supplement our
> responses anyway.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sally Monico*
> 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4506
>
> Main: 404.266.9171
>
> smonico@mmatllaw.com **PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2022 1:34 PM
> *To:* Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
> *Cc:* Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Blue Surveyor signature disclaimer?
>
>
>
> Thank you for explaining that. I know Eric is currently reviewing - but as
> another question -
>
>
>
> Would it be more helpful to omit this comment, since this is my
> assumption - I don't know if saying less is better in these types of
> situations etc?
>
>
>
> *Zeeman has since learned that the two rebar corner pins have been missing
> on the Osborne side of the property since the City of Brookhaven did work
> in the Right of Way which could explain the difference in Sweatman’s
> Surveys and the migration of the corner pin on Grove Street.*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:21 AM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sarah,
>
>
>
> It just depends on the purpose and scope of the survey.  If they survey
> was never intended to be recorded it may not need a blue ink signature or
> certification.  It doesn’t mean the survey is necessarily wrong or
> unreliable.
>
>
>
> Surveyors can prepare drawings, retracements, ect. for a host of different
> purposes.  If the scope of one survey is to identify the boundary line then
> it may not show the location of easements or any utilities.  That’s why
> outlining the scope and purpose of the survey work ordered at the outset is
> so important.  If the new survey we obtain varies from prior surveys and
> records Mr. Chastain will make note of those differences and his opinions
> as to same.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sally Monico*
> 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4506
>
> Main: 404.266.9171
>
> smonico@mmatllaw.com **PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2022 10:35 AM
> *To:* Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Blue Surveyor signature disclaimer?
>
>
>
> Does it matter that the disclaimer on the survey talks about a blue ink
> signature?
>
>
>
> https://prnt.sc/iW6H_O6WPP1Z
>
>
>
>  I also never received a physical copy of the survey illegally ordered, by
> the 1st attorney(attached)
>
>
>
>  Also attached the variance approval survey with no sewer
> easement included and no blue ink.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Smokeball Reference:
> 5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8/d0037fe9-0297-4187-a657-9b4533036456.
>