Tue 3 May 2022 18 00 39 0400 Re Sweatman V. Zeeman Zeeman Discovery Responses Statutory 1808Bf09 2¶

I agree, no access to my property. The surveyor came today @ 8am hence his
reach out. The results of the new survey are the similar and a little more
in his favor than his survey I believe.

 I uploaded a video of him hammering/covering  the open fence corners 4/23
(my dog tried to escape via corner the night before, they were on the porch
& heard me yelling to get him back in)

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 5:50 PM Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
> Please see the email chain below where plaintiff is asking for access to
> your property to stain and paint the fence. I assume you have no interest
> in allowing this access nor do I think it a good idea to allow any more
> money or effort to be put into a fence that we are trying to have removed.
> Allowing the fence to be enhanced before the court determines whether it
> stays or goes is inconsistent with your claims and may be seen as
> acquiescence to his position.
>
> Please let us know your thoughts or call me to discuss.
>
> Thanks
>
> Richard Capriola
> Winter Capriola Zenner, LLC
> 404-844-5637
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>
> *Date:* May 3, 2022 at 9:53:34 AM EDT
> *To:* Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>, Brett Ledermeier <
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>, Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>,
> "Richard J. Capriola" <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>, "Eric B. Coleman" <
> ecoleman@wczlaw.com>
> *Subject:* *RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses -
> Statutory Electronic Service*
>
> 
>
> *CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.*
>
>
> Counsel:
>
>
>
> Good morning. Last week I sent a request for permission for my client and
> his contractor to gain temporary access to your client’s property in an
> effort to preserve and protect the fence. In addition to the preservation
> of the fence, painting and staining the fence will enhance the aesthetics
> of the fence for your client.  In addition, I requested an update on the
> documents that were to be provided shortly after 4.1.22.
>
>
>
> I have not heard back from anyone in response to both requests, other than
> Tania’s email below.  Please provide an update on both items.
>
>
>
> I am available to discuss the parameters around the request to paint/stain
> the fence, so as to maintain the peace between our clients.  I appreciate
> someone reaching out to me this week.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: image002.png]
>
> *Lisa Rose*
> Rose Litigation, LLC
>
> *Mailing: *  4880 Lower Roswell Rd. Ste 165
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/4880%0D%0A+Lower+Roswell+Rd.+Ste+165?entry=gmail&source=g>-522
> Marietta, GA 30068
>
> *Physical:* 533 Johnson Ferry Road
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/533%0D%0A+Johnson+Ferry+Road?entry=gmail&source=g>,
> Bld. D, Suite 400, Marietta, GA 30068
> *O:* 678.806.8188 <770.231.9783>  *E: *lisa@roselitigation.lawyer
> <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer> *W: *www.roselitigation.lawyer
>
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
>
>
> This e-mail is from a law firm, and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not
> read, copy or otherwise distribute this e-mail or any attachments hereto.
> If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by reply
> e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. In the absence of an
> Engagement Letter or a signed Fee Agreement, receipt of this email,
> including attachments, does NOT constitute any legal advice, does NOT
> establish any attorney-client relationship, and does NOT create any legal
> duty. If you are a client of this firm, please be advised that copying,
> forwarding or transmitting this email in any way to any third party may
> WAIVE your attorney/client privilege, which may have a detrimental impact
> on your case.
>
>
>
> *From:* Tania Tuttle <ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2022 9:41 AM
> *To:* Lisa Rose <lisa@roselitigation.lawyer>; Brett Ledermeier <
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Cc:* Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>; Richard J. Capriola <
> rcapriola@wczlaw.com>; Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>
> *Subject:* RE: Sweatman v. Zeeman; Zeeman Discovery Responses - Statutory
> Electronic Service
>
>
>
> Lisa – Sally had her baby (healthy baby boy!) and is now out on maternity
> leave.  I will confer with co-counsel and one of us will get back to you on
> both.
>
>
> Thanks, Tania
>
>
>
> *Tania R. Tuttle *
> Partner, Real Estate Litigation
>
>
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive.
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive.++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>  |
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive.++%7C++Ste+125+%7C++Alpharetta,+Ga+30009?entry=gmail&source=g>
>  Ste 125
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/11625+Rainwater+Drive.++%7C++Ste+1