Skip to content

Thu 19 Jun 2025 13 17 12 0400 Re Request For Documents And Return Of Communications 1978931D 2

Field Value
Category Discovery > Written Discovery
Confidence medium
Reason Filename indicates document request response; content unavailable for verification
Original File thu_19_jun_2025_13_17_12_-0400_re_request_for_documents_and_return_of_communications_1978931d_2.eml
File Type EML
Source gmail-export
thu_19_jun_2025_13_17_12_-0400_re_request_for_documents_and_return_of_communications_1978931d_2.eml

Email

Header Value
From Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
To Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
CC Celeste Watwood <cwatwood@mmatllaw.com>
Subject Re: Request for Documents and Return of Communications
Date Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:17:12 -0400
Email Body
Hi Brett,

Thank you. Brett, you have misspoken, as I called you again this morning at
9:31 a.m. ET, and I have my phone records that confirm this.

*1. Yes, please send ALL requested documents today.*

*2. The fence needs to be moved immediately, as it is not in compliance
with the court transcript (pg 41). I've completed what I needed to do.*

*3. Yes, please include me in the call with the City Attorney, and on all
future calls and communications, please confirm the call's time and dial-in
#.*

*4. Who initiated the previous call you mentioned, of Gaddy/Plat Expediter*
+
*City Attorney, please list the names of each and every party involved in
the call and name all the parties that were aware of this call.*

*5. Why was Gaddy speaking directly with the City Attorney concerning my
property, inserting himself in a Brookhaven citizen's private lawsuit,
without my knowledge or notifying my lawyer, Jeff Banks?*

*After you've answered these questions, **let's schedule a call before
tomorrow's call with the City Attorney.*







On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:18 AM Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
wrote:

> Sarah,
>
>
>
> I am happy to send you communications and related documents with the
> Court. As for the calls, Jeff and I spoke numerous times over the last two
> weeks; I am unsure as to why there is any allegation to the contrary. With
> regard to any call from you, I do not have a missed call or request for
> call. I have sent numerous requests to you regarding the settlement that
> have gone unanswered; those requests have also offered to set up a call. If
> you would like to schedule a call with me, please let me know your
> availability.
>
>
>
> Further, I was about to email you as the City Attorney reached out after
> speaking with Gaddy/plat expediter and would like to do a virtual meeting
> tomorrow to discuss the plat and Court Order/case generally. I am waiting
> for the time confirmation and you don’t need to be in attendance, but if
> you would like to attend please let me know. Essentially, the City is
> saying they aren’t bound by the Court Order, which we anticipated would
> happen, but the Court Order route was what Gaddy suggested and the adjacent
> owner chose that route over a variance appeal route, which was his choice,
> not ours. Despite that route, they might still need to go the variance
> route; it depends on what the City Attorney says or demands (we don’t want
> to expand the litigation by involving the City as a named party).
>
>
>
> I’ve copied my paralegal, Celeste, hereto. As previously stated, I am
> happy to schedule a call with you.
>
>
>
> *Brett Michael-Schiff Ledermeier*
> *Senior Associate, Real Estate Litigation*
>
>
> *Mailing:  850 Windy Hill Road | Unit 1762 | Smyrna, GA 30081*
>
> 11625 Rainwater Drive  |  Ste 125   |   Alpharetta, Ga 30009
> Direct:  404.365.4564
>
> Main: 770.200.7000
>
> bledermeier@mmatllaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
> sender immediately.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:37 AM
> *To:* Brett Ledermeier <bledermeier@mmatllaw.com>
> *Subject:* Request for Documents and Return of Communications
>
>
>
> Dear Brett,
>
> I am writing to formally request that you provide me with copies of ALL
> documents, not limited to drafts, agreements, emails, and any other
> materials related to my court case, that you submitted or provided to the
> court in March 2025.
>
> Additionally, I respectfully ask that you return the unanswered phone
> calls from both my attorney, Jeff Banks, and me at your earliest
> convenience.
>
> Thank you for your prompt attention to these matters.
>
> Best regards,
> Sarah
> Smokeball Reference V3:
> fe80318a-fdfb-425f-9025-d790159d3013_5ab3d264-03bd-4ce8-b9f1-2c8a9bf470a8_f9729806-8c7f-4954-a881-d0ffe8221de0.
>
> *Disclaimer*
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
> be unlawful.
>
> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
> automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in 

Attachments

image001.jpg (image/jpeg, 4 KB)

image001.jpg

Download Original (.eml)