Fri 1 Apr 2022 17 46 30 0400 Re Zeeman Discovery 17Fe7181 2¶

He didn't present me with the surveys at the time...he just just said he
did them.... didnt know if that is relevant. or not

". Zeeman did not agree to installation of the new fence as she disputed
the findings of surveys presented by Sweatman and further understood the
two feet in question, or the “Disputed Property” to be part of the Zeeman
Property by either grant or adverse possession. "

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:14 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> still reading almost
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:14 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com> wrote:
>
>> Sarah, I’m not concerned about the way drafted.
>>
>>
>>
>> You hired an attorney to represent you after there was a disagreement
>> regarding the location of the boundary.  That’s the way I read it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am I good to finalize and send to Sweatman counsel?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sally Monico*
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
>> Direct:  404.365.4506
>>
>> Main: 404.266.9171
>>
>> smonico@mmatllaw.com **PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2022 5:05 PM
>> *To:* Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
>> *Cc:* Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>; Tania Tuttle <
>> ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>;
>> Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>; Joanie J. Williams <
>> jwilliams@wczlaw.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: Zeeman Discovery
>>
>>
>>
>> i hired the boundary lawyer right after the ultimatum- not before, does
>> that matter?
>>
>>
>>
>> In early May 2021, Zeeman told Sweatman the land was hers through adverse
>> possession and she hired a lawyer to represent her in the boundary line
>> dispute. On August 7, 2021, Sweatman gave Zeeman an ultimatum
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:57 PM Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Changes made.  Finals attached.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sarah with your agreement/approval I will resolve all comments and
>> finalize for submission.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sally Monico*
>> 11625 Rainwater Drive | Ste. 125 | Alpharetta, Georgia 30009
>> Direct:  404.365.4506
>>
>> Main: 404.266.9171
>>
>> smonico@mmatllaw.com **PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of this communication in
>> absence of an engagement letter or fee contract. In addition, unless you
>> are in the To: or CC: line of this email, you are not an intended
>> recipient. The information accompanying this email transmission may
>> contain confidential or legally privileged information meant for ONLY
>> the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you
>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> reliance upon the contents of this email is strictly prohibited. If you
>> receive this email in error, please delete this email and notify the
>> sender immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Friday, April 1, 2022 4:51 PM
>> *To:* Eric B. Coleman <ecoleman@wczlaw.com>
>> *Cc:* Sally L. Monico <SCook@mmatllaw.com>; Tania Tuttle <
>> ttuttle@mmatllaw.com>; Lucy Aquino <Lucy.Aquino@swiftcurrie.com>;
>> Richard J. Capriola <rcapriola@wczlaw.com>; Joanie J. Williams <
>> jwilliams@wczlaw.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: Zeeman Discovery
>>
>>
>>
>> *RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5:*
>>
>> Therefore, all windows were replaced in the same windowpane sills from
>> original construction except the four windows in the breakfast nook area
>> maintained the same sill outline of the four windows, and together they
>> became a single flat window for a less obstructed view of the backyard
>> including the ability to open at the bottom, all within the same sill
>> frame.                       By way of further answer, Zeeman refers
>> Petitioner to the non-privileged and relevant documents
>>
>>    - *The breakfast nook area with the 4 windows that became 1 large
>>    flat window doesn't open at the bottom*
>>    - *The garden window- the one he's suing over that one does open at
>>    the bottom*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:39 PM Sarah Zeeman <szeeman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> also need to remove him thx
>>
>> *RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY